Will Advertisers Sue Google To See Your Email?
from the seems-to-take-the-argument-a-bit-far dept
The misplaced hype over Gmail's potential legal problems for putting up contextual ads in your email seems to have thankfully died down. However, Mark Rasch, over at Security Focus is trying to dig it back up again with a somewhat more thoughtful piece about whether or not Gmail breaks existing laws by scanning emails without the permission of the sender as well. It seems like a stretch - and about the best that can be said is that some of the wording of older laws may need to be adjusted to take into account the concept of email. Otherwise, it doesn't seem like there's a real problem here. However, as an aside, he does bring up an interesting (if unlikely) possibility. What if an advertiser feels that Google is lying about inserting their ads, or believes that Google is inserting competitor's ads instead? Could they then subpoena your emails in order to prove the point? This would, obviously, violate your privacy through no action of your own doing. However, this seems like a huge stretch. First, I'm sure that Google's contract makes it clear that they're not required to put in an ad in all circumstances, so there would be little legal recourse for a company. Second, since the ads are placed on the fly, there's no specific reason why anyone's email should be subpoenaed. The ads are not associated with the email itself - but that particular viewing of the email. So, gaining access to the emails won't show the same ads that were originally placed and will do nothing to prove the legal case one way or the other.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
(I mean paying in the sense of both literally paying for my inbox, and also as in using an email that someone else has paid for that I have agreed to their terms to use).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
If an advertiser is paying per insert and the dispute is about how many inserts were done, then I would think that google would be required to prove that they did indeed insert the amount of times they charged their customer. If google charges company x for 10 inserts, then, yes, google IS required to have inserted 10 times.
I would think it is reasonable to assume google can and should provide some proof that they are delivering what they say they are. Otherwise, what would prevent them from claiming and charging for inserts that arent done?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
This is something that could be easily fixed in google's TOS. Also, whoever wrote the article has never read the existing adwords tos. Google in no way garauntees that your ad won't be shown with a competitor's ads. They explicitely mention that. They might already cover gmail in their privacy policy. If not, they easily could. This article is almost certainly moot.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Webserver logs
[ link to this | view in thread ]