Time For Hospitals To Join The Information Age
from the it's-about-time dept
While there are some hospitals who have successfully moved into the digital age, plenty haven't budged from their old paper-based filing system. It's not so much that hospitals dislike technology. They buy all sorts of advanced medical technology all the time. But, when it comes to administrative technology and things like computerized prescription systems - which might save lives by preventing mistakes - hospitals don't seem to care. The complaints range from doctors who are afraid the new system will slow them down, to hospitals who point out that the only benefit to these systems is to the patients (you know, the folks who don't want to die) and not the hospital itself. Yes, the health of a patient is secondary to profitability these days. Of course, considering the high price of malpractice lawsuits, you would think such systems might pay for themselves. It's certainly a political hot potato, though. Politicians are now looking for ways to force hospitals to join the twenty-first century and update their computer systems to prevent errors.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
More complicated than that
- What if the new computerized system has software bugs, makes fatal mistakes, and kills patients?
- What if the new computerized system allows information to flow freely to health insurers, so patients get upset?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Profit matters. Yes. Unless the government wants to subsidize it.
Hospitals usually have better IT staff than you might realize. If the government and vendors want the hospitals to move to newer systems, then there should be a benefit to both the hospital and the customer/patient. When it benefits both, it will be freely and widely adopted.
And regardless of how good the technology is, there will always be mistakes and there will always be law suits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Newer isn't always better.
The thing that's missing in the sarcastic slant posted here is the fact that electronic patient records are not more secure than paper records. The basic problem is that the general public who are NOT geeks just don't care about passwords or walking away from their terminal with patient data openly displayed on the monitor. Personally, I'd prefer the paper record hands down - it's a lot less likely to get 'lost', copied, etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Newer isn't always better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]