Many People Ready To Go Mobile Only, Maybe
from the can-you-hear-me-here? dept
LetsTalk (who is hardly an unbiased party) has come out with a study showing that, if coverage were a little better and prices were a little lower, a large percentage of people would be willing to ditch their landlines for mobile phones. Basically, what they're saying is "if my mobile phone works as well as my home phone, sure I'd ditch my landline." This isn't all that surprising, though, the folks behind the study obviously want to make it seem like it's big news. The more interesting aspect of the study may be the footnote in the article claiming that not too many people are interested in wireless broadband. The study found that only 8% said they wanted wireless broadband, which is probably meaningless. It's a situation where they're first talking to people about their mobile phones, and then switching gears and asking about wireless broadband. Many people, in that context, will respond negatively -- thinking that they don't need broadband on their mobile phone. However, the power of wireless broadband has very little to do with mobile phones. It's also a technology that most people have little experience with, and those are the types of technologies where asking people if they want them beforehand will give you a very different response than if you actually offer the technology and see how people use it. In the end, what will drive wireless broadband usage isn't "wireless broadband," but the applications that make wireless broadband valuable. This study didn't ask about that.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
POTS still has better international rates
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
What's that ?
I got rid of mine years ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: POTS still has better international rates
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: POTS still has better international rates
1. A lot of those vendors are sleazy
2. The reception is bad
3. I would get charged minutes on my cell phone plan anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: POTS still has better international rates
I would get charged minutes on my cell phone plan anyway.
Do you make most of your international calls during peak time?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: POTS still has better international rates
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Been there, Done that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wireless broadband
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
shout up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
shout up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]