Study Says BitTorrent Use Up -- But Findings Not Clear
from the misleading-with-stats-again... dept
Following last week's incredibly misleading study from the MPAA about people trading movies online, a company trying to sell network management technologies has put out their own study claiming that movie traders are now just using BitTorrent instead of Kazaa. Now, that might be true, but the study doesn't actually support the conclusions the company claims it does. First, they're obviously trying to sell their offering, as they make sure to mention that file sharing costs ISPs $10 million in bandwidth costs. That may be true, but considering the fact that broadband providers offer "all you can eat" plans, they don't have much to complain about when someone eats all they can. Second, the study never actually looks at what content is being shared (or at least they don't make it clear). Instead, they just look at overall amount of traffic, never once admitting that plenty of BitTorrent traffic is perfectly legitimate, non-infringing traffic. The purpose of BitTorrent is to distribute large files efficiently, and that's what many people use it for. In fact, BitTorrent is a horrible system for exchanging unauthorized files because the system clearly broadcasts who you are. Instead, they just imply that BitTorrent is this horrible new version of Kazaa that's better for exchanging big movies -- without ever proving that people are using it for the illegal exchange of movies. Does it happen? Sure. But, the implications of the study should be supported by more factual information rather than innuendo.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I'd go one step further
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'd go one step further
Thanks to streaming news, BitTorrent, eMule, Kazaa, and the $60ish I pay for phone and dsl I have been able to get rid of cable tv, dump my tivo and have not been forced to watch a single Ad in almost 3 years.
I'm not costing anyone anything as everything I watch is freely available through NetFlix. I have a cheapo proxy account with Netflix that I share with my neighbor.
Again, everything commercial I download is available through NetFlix. Including the right for or crime of home taping.
When it comes to Music, I swap my 100+ cd collection with my Neighbors. They rip mine, I rip theirs. That's just the same right or crime of home taping.
And that's not even covering stream-ripping.
Today the only place I'm forced to allow myself to endure a sales pitch is at the start of the movies or a DVD. And on the highway, and on the radio.. but you get the point.
The folks streaming or mailing dvds about already paid for me. I gladly pay them for that and as long as I get to be in control of where and how I store my files, all's well.
Thats my Techdirt. Do I go to jail now and cost somebody 2/3rd my salary so I can do absolutely nothing. Did I just induce some criminal behaviour in someone? Let me know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
In other news, gas stations lose billions of gallons of fuel each year to people who drive cars.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Peer-to-peer savings
Actually, the quote about P2P costs to ISPs comes from a spokesman for CacheLogic, a company that makes products that, as far as I can tell, do two things: 1) cache centrally-served information more locally and 2) restrict P2P traffic. It's pretty clear that adoption of P2P would threaten their business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]