Microsoft Wants More Patents
from the well,-they-want-more-of-everything... dept
It's unfortunate that companies still feel the need to equate patents to "innovation" when the opposite is often true. These days, unfortunately, many companies feel the need to get patents simply as a defensive measure. Whether for defense or offense, it appears that Bill Gates believes Microsoft needs more patents. The company is ramping up their efforts to file for more patents and plan toThank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
I'm particularly fond of that one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
I'm not a huge MS supporter, but I don't know about this knee jerk reactive statement. In a lot of ways, patenting everything is MS's solution to the patent office; namely, if they didn't patent some of this obvious stuff, they're afraid they'll be sued over it. The real question will arise when they have the chance to enforce these patents -- what do they do then?
Look at IBM....they have a ton more patents than anyone else, to my knowledge, and actively pursue more. For the most part they seem to use them to protect themselves, however.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
I'm tending to agree with the anonymous poster above...they will use all that money and power to the best of their abilities.
They can't buy open source...BUT, the threat of a lawsuit over a spurious patent by Microsoft WILL shut down MANY MANY open source projects...effectively hamstringing the acceptance of open source (a competitor winning more and more recruits away from them every day).
Think about it...you're a project of maybe a dozen core programmers...maybe all working on it in your spare time or you've made a small(ish) company and are making a reasonable amount of money. One cease-and-desist letter from Microsoft and you are toast. Yeah, you MIGHT be able to win in the court of law...but that's thousands (if not MILLIONS) of dollars and YEARS down the line because while you MIGHT be able to afford ONE good lawyer (or get pro-bono from a couple), Microsoft can throw away MILLIONS and an ENTIRE legal department at you to make SURE you pay as much as possible for your victory.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]