If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Hertz Ordered To Tell Court How Many Thousands Of Renters It Falsely Accuses Of Theft Every Year
- Even As Trump Relies On Section 230 For Truth Social, He's Claiming In Lawsuits That It's Unconstitutional
- Letter From High-Ranking FBI Lawyer Tells Prosecutors How To Avoid Court Scrutiny Of Firearms Analysis Junk Science
- FTC Promises To Play Hardball With Robocall-Enabling VOIP Providers
- FOIA Lawsuit Featuring A DC Police Whistleblower Says PD Conspired To Screw Requesters It Didn't Like
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
If so, what is your take on that experience versus another on line music store ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iTMS and money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It does make sense in a twisted sort of way...
Apple might not be making much, but the recording industry is probably making a lot of money off of ITMS. I could see where Apple may have signed into an exclusive contract with the recording industry for the sole purpose of pushing the iPod. Contrary to that, the recording industry may have put in an exclusive option to prevent Apple/Fairplay from becoming the defacto standard. I mean, if you have one standard used for all devices and some cracker breaks that standard, then everyone will be sharing their tunes online. Even worse, patching the hole would be a BIG problem since you'd have to patch every device on the market. We can't have that, can we?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why not the other way around?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]