Misconceptions About Online Ad Misconceptions
from the oh-well dept
Adam Penenberg has been doing a great job with his column for Wired, discussing ways that online media is changing. However, his latest piece is a bit weak. He takes a look at some "misconceptions" about online advertising and tries to set the record straight. The main gist of the story is that annoying advertising works. Of course, in order to support that statement, you have to explain what you mean by "works," and the article doesn't do a very good job, other than to bring up something of a self-fulfilling definition: if it didn't work, advertisers wouldn't use them. However, taking a longer term view of annoying advertising suggests its only meant to be successful in the short term before people learn how to avoid it. Also, most of the "misconceptions" aren't misconceptions at all. Plenty of studies have shown that there is a small percentage of people out there who buy from spam, so that's not much of a misconception. As for popups, which get the "they must work because they're there" treatment in the article, studies have shown that most clicks are accidental as the pop up gets in the way of a mouse click or it happened as someone was closing the browser. Studies have also shown that, long term, popups are bad for business because they give people a negative impression of the companies who use them. The last two "misconceptions" Penenberg lists aren't really misconceptions at all. The first deals with Claria, concerning whether or not it's okay to show competing ads next to a website if the user chooses to see them. Beyond noting that his support on this point is just from Claria itself, this is, as we've pointed out before a simple trademark issue. The final misconception is that internet advertising doesn't work. Anyone looking at any report on the online advertising market in the last twelve months clearly knows that hasn't been true in quite some time. Besides, part of what made internet advertising valuable again was exactly the opposite of Penenberg's premise. It wasn't the annoying or intrusive ads, but that toned down, contextual or highly targeted ads became more popular.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
poor targets...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]