When 60% Of Your Phone Bill Is From Unadvertised Fees
from the seems-a-bit-extreme dept
We've had plenty of stories about phone companies and all of the additional fees they add to your bill, but the Miami Herald has a few examples where the situation clearly goes beyond any reasonable level. Take, for example, a simple plan from BellSouth, advertised at $11.04/month. What they leave is out the extra $16 in fees and taxes (BugMeNot required) that turn the $11 plan into a $27 one. Then, there are companies like Primus which is adding a $15 "low usage" fee for anyone who doesn't make $25 worth of long distance calls per month. The telcos come back with their usual refrain that they somehow "need" to collect this fee "to recoup normal business expenses." That, of course, is a ridiculous statement. Any normal business prices their "normal business expenses" into their advertised prices. This is simply a way for the telcos to advertise lower prices than they're really charging. Perhaps other companies should get into this game as well. Want a pizza pie? It's just $3, but there's a $3.50 "crust fee," a $9.38 "oven fee," a $4.50 "service fee," and a $2.18 "cleanup fee." Plus tax.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hidden costs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hidden costs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
The problem isnt the advertising, the laws, the lawyers, or the horrific marketing ideas, it is the stinking moronic sheep that accept that this is the way it is and pay for the service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"normal businesses"
If so, there are fewer and fewer "normal businesses" every day. Of course we already know that rental cars never cost as much as the advertised rate (my car in a recent trip to Hawaii cost nearly $400 above the advertised rate). And the phone plans, as you mention. But the same goes for broadband -- the advertised rate never includes the DSL line fee, and Comcast's advertisements for cable modems only lists the price for the "special promotional period" -- if you want to know what it will cost after that, you have to call their sales department. I think this is the new wave of American marketing. Soon your apartment will cost $200 a month -- plus a few additional fees, of course.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can't have it both ways
I won't defend the legtimacy of the costs much less the titles they are assigned, however, a business generally needs to coup some cost per customer to remain somewhat profitable (note that phone companies while great cash cows do not generate much profit consider their huge bottom line). As long as there's some competition between the companies the cost should be competitive. The phone companies pretty much have their hands tied by federal and local governments so they have to be creative when offering plans and in their billing.
The alternative is to get out of the business and I don't think the country is ready to start letting their phone companies pack up tent.
For the record; I curse, swear, and roll my eyes at the costs I see on my phone bill as much as the next person. I also know I can go elsewhere if I don't like it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can't have it both ways
I thought it was pretty clearly about the way it's being advertised that bugs me. If the bill is going to be $27, they shouldn't be able to advertise it as $11. I have no problem with a company charging what they think is right, but if they're tricking people into signing up a price that isn't what they'll be charged, that's a problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can't have it both ways
That said, I respect people’s dismay over the garbage fees that pump up their monthly wireless bills. What I don’t get is why more people aren’t upset with the government and regulatory agencies that impose the mandates that cause these fee hikes. Universal Service Fee, Telephone Relay for the Deaf, number pooling and portability - not taxes by definition - but all mandated by government just the same. Carriers don’t have the discretion to say no to these costs (neither do their customers).
So why aren’t these taxes? – because they aren’t passed back to the government and the carrier isn’t required by government to collect them. But, they still have to absorb the cost. As I see it, it’s just government forcing business to pay for services government should be providing (or not providing based on one’s political inclinations.)
And then there’s pure government surcharges. For example, the City of Baltimore charges $3.50 per month per customer – just because it can – and it needs the money. It’s a nice model for politicians – fund services w/o having to “raise taxes.”
I read all the time that folks want these costs factored into the monthly service fees. To me, that's really hiding the costs. Is there anyone out there that prefers to see these govt. garbage fees line itemed? I do, but that’s just me. It reminds me where I should be directing my disdain.
As for advertising, should carriers move the tax and mandates line items out of the small print and put them up front with the rate plans? That doesn’t seem to be a popular approach for any other industry that has to (or chooses to) tack on garbage fees.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can't have it both ways
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can't have it both ways
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Institutionalized lying
They were trying to convince me that my phone bill was higher than the service they were trying to sell me. Don't you also have taxes and fees?
The lies from the phone companies demonstartes their lack of customer awareness. As a customer I want to know the price as how much I will pay. It is really not important to me to know how much the phone company will get! That is their problem.
The reasons why a company would trash customers in this way:
1) they hate customers
2) they have no problem with lies
3) they are evil
4) they don't realize that their monay comes from customers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Institutionalized lying
DECAF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The advertised pricing of an item very rarely includes sales tax, with gasoline being one notable exception. This hasn't bothered people and companies view it as outside of their control. The trend continued with governmental fees not being included because the companies "don't have control over those". It has continued to increased with more and more costs being included in the "no control over these" category all in the name of convincing the customer that they're getting a great deal on the costs that the company can "control".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and do what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]