Get The Hint Yet? Long Distance Isn't Worth Squat
from the going-nowhere-fast dept
Okay, for those who missed the first two memos, it should be clear right now that the long distance telco business is not the business to be in right now. First AT&T, and then Sprint made it clear that traditional residential long distance was a big time loser, and now MCI (who was supposed to have all that post-bankruptcy no-more-debt-here ability to rise above everything) is writing down $3.5 billion in assets thanks to trouble all over the place. Now, the question for all three, is figuring out what business they're really in -- and doing it before more trouble sets in. Both AT&T and Sprint seem to be placing bets, but it's not entirely clear where MCI's future lies.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Still
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Still
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Still
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Still
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Still
The only downside right now is reliability, but the argument that VoIP can't do international calls is totally clueless. What VoIP system were you using?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Still
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Still
We're not talking about MSN voice or netmeeting voice. We're talking about dedicated VoIP systems like Vonage or even (on the software side) skype.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Still
And I'm talking about using VoIP at home. Japanese phone lines use different carrier signals, so American telephones don't work. What VoIP is there that is guaranteed to run on a machine running Japanese Windows Millenium (not XP, not English) over a Japanese DSL?
>We're not talking about MSN voice or netmeeting voice. We're talking about dedicated VoIP systems like Vonage or even (on the software side) skype.
Exactly, do these things work on the configuration above? Is there a guarantee that it will not destroy the machine, as other software installs have? What is the cost effectiveness of having to call home first via POTS and waiting five minutes for them to boot up their machine? Both of us would have to buy upgraded microphones as well, which do not echo from the speakers. That was a severe problem when using MSN voice, and I the physics for VoIP are the same. If both of us have to pay for skype/Vonage and a new microphone, which may echo anyway, then it is not worth it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]