Puretunes Pays Out To The RIAA
from the well-that-did-nothing... dept
Last year, a company opened up in Spain called Puretunes, that claimed they had the right licenses in place to sell MP3 music at a flat rate. The company claimed that, in Spain, all you needed was permission from the Spanish authors' and performers' rights societies. However, the RIAA (despite this being a Spanish company) quickly and vehemently disagreed. Today comes the news that the company, which was actually started by the same folks who ran Grokster, has settled the lawsuit by paying out $500,000. Also, the parent company of Puretunes was ordered to pay $10 million -- but that company no longer exists. The folks behind Puretunes still claim that they did have all the necessary agreements... over email. They just didn't have the actual papers signed. This sounds highly unlikely. If they had the agreements, why not get the papers signed to make it clear?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]