Hilary Rosen Suddenly Understands Creative Commons
from the took-a-while... dept
Slashdot notes that Hilary Rosen, now that she's no longer in charge of the RIAA, has suddenly found the time to find out what Larry Lessig's Creative Commons is all about and decided that, it's really not such a bad thing after all. This is what's scary. Many people supporting Creative Commons and other views on business models for the recording industry have been trying to clearly explain how these things can help the industry, and repeatedly the industry refuses to listen -- assuming that the only people who are suggesting changes are simply trying to destroy the industry. So now, quite some time after she's out of the office where she should have actually listened to what was being said, she suddenly realizes that it's not so bad, after all (though, some of her statements aren't exactly a ringing endorsement of the idea).Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hilary's public lament
Sounds more like she's found herself outside the castle walls, smells money in the new digital world and is looking for a job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
1 - They would make less money.
Yes. There would still be opportunity to make SOME money...but less of it and they would have to work more, change paradigm etc. Why should they, if they play dumb, they can continue raking in the dough as long as we let them (which seems to be a really long time).
2 - They have NO NEED to change.
Its easier for them to step up the rhetoric, buy politicians and co-opt law enforcement than it is to redesign their business. While their downfall IS inevitable, it is by no means happening in the short term, the goal of the people in charge is to keep it going as long as possible while they are in charge...the second their situation/business model/practices becomes untenable..watch how smart their chairperson will be in "getting" all the new ideas and turning their business around.
So you can have the most brilliant arguments put forward in such a way that a precocious 6 year old would understand and they will always deny deny deny and play dumb, because frankly, that's where the money is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]