A Plan To Help The US Innovate?
from the not-very-innovative... dept
One of the main themes appearing here, of course, is that we believe the economy is much better off when real innovation is encouraged. While many politicians seem to pay lip service to innovation (or, bizarrely, assume that the patent system is a proxy for innovation when the two are hardly related any more), a new report out of Washington DC points out that the US is losing its ability to out-innovate other countries and suggests a few steps to put us back on the right track. Some seem a bit goofy, such as creating a national Innovation Czar and innovation prize to encourage innovation. Others are the sorts of things that seem very obvious to plenty of people, but don't get much attention in DC, such as completely reforming our patent and intellectual property system. Of course, these days, we're more likely to get an "Innovation Czar" who thinks that the more patents we have, the more innovation he or she has presided over.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Money money money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Age of high overhead costs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does Divorce reduce the number of innovators?
The divorce system!
It acts as a wealth transfer system from the rich to the poor, from the more capable to the less capable.
It tends to place the children with the less capable.
If the children are very bright they lose a lot: a parent who understands them
and can teach them at their level and help them develop their talents.
The bright parent can made them feel it is "ok" to be bright, instead of feeling alone.
The children lose the stimulation and example that having a bright parent at home provides.
Currently, due to the bias in the system, society provides an incentive to the less capable to start a divorce.
Until this is corrected, the costs of divorce in crime, mental health and lower educational performance will continue to burden society.
You only need a relatively few brilliant people to create a lot of wealth. Reducing their numbers slightly has a big negative effect.
The financial transfer also makes lawyers rich. So bright children do law; thereby drawing the bright away from creative wealth making activities for society.
Laws and judges can make the society rich or poor.
Who will start studying the system wide effects poor behavioral incentives, like divorce, have on society?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Dreaded Czar Title
If you're ever offered a 'czar position', my advice: DON'T TAKE IT!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]