Nanotech: The Rebranding Of Chemistry And Other Boring Sciences

from the it's-all-in-the-sizzle dept

There's been a lot of talk about "nanotechnology" lately, and we've noted in the past that an awful lot of these companies seem to simply be about taking anything "small" that sounds science fiction-like and building up some buzz around it. Business Week is running an interview with a nanotechnology "world leader," talking up the space -- but you have to question what exactly the space really is. When asked about the "hype," this expert claims that all the hype is around nanobots -- which no one is seriously working on. Of course, nanobots seem to be the closest thing to actually being new and innovative compared to the rest of the space. In fact, it's hard to tell from the article how everything else he's talking about is anything other than chemistry, with a shiny coat of marketing hype and dreams of big payouts from investors. Of course, chemistry is considered boring to many, so perhaps nanotechnology is simply how a bunch of chemists and PR people have figured out how to dupe investors out of lots of money that they wouldn't normally invest. At least that would fit with the definition one scientist has given to the field of nanotechnology: "the ability to continue to obtain funding for what you claim is of nano importance."
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Dave, 28 Dec 2004 @ 5:29pm

    Chemistry Boring?

    It wouldn't be the actual chemists running to the investors. Chemists, for the record, make a career out of handling the most dangerous substances on the planet on a regular basis, so the sales engineers can run to the investors. So what is boring would be the lies and exagerations given to the potential investor, which only perhaps a chemist could recognize as such. Chemistry is a terrifying job, trying not to be destroyed by the demands of the latest technology market. So if the technology is boring, blame the sales guys for beating a dead horse, instead of the poor guy in the lab.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Nanopolis, 12 Oct 2005 @ 6:06am

    Is that so?

    Just go to http://nanotech.nanopolis.net and you will pretty much about what nanotechnology really is.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.