When All The Humans Are Gone From Customer Support
from the can't-find-them-anywhere! dept
The NY Times is running an article similar to ones that others have run before, noting how incredibly difficult it is to actually get a human on the phone these days when you need customer support from a company. While many people know the "tricks" such as hitting 0 to get around the painful menus, it looks like some companies are spending more time making it harder for customers to reach humans (rather than, say, actually figuring out ways to help their customers). This means that the "0" trick won't always work -- though, sometimes hitting it three or four times in a row will get you through. Other tricks include hitting the * key in the hopes of getting a company directory. What's still not clear is why companies do this. Most of these automated systems simply keep people on these phone calls for a longer period of time and tend to piss them off. My favorite system so far was a Comcast system that required me to go through twelve menus before I could speak to a human, whose first question to me was "what phone number are you calling from" when in step two or three I had specifically punched in my phone number.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
We were once told that a phone call to our department was calculated to 'cost' the company $50. Now, the fact that our customers pay nearly $1,000 per year for support makes me feel as if our company is attempting to slight customers.
They constantly try to push people to use our online support knowledge base or our e-mail support system rather than encourage letting them call in.
I understand that some poobah in upper management is probably looking at a spreadsheet somewhere, and they're trying to find the fine balance between just how much customers will put up with and accept vs. how many customers they can keep on support plans. To tell the truth, I prefer they call in and talk to me because I'm more likely to help them fix the issue on the first go-around rather than let them try to fix it themselves with the solutions in the online knowledgebase and make a bigger mess, which only results in a LONGER phone call.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
I'm a customer-service veteran too, but I see the balancing act a little differently: "Should we charge everyone for the one-on-one contact which follows a power-law distribution?" (ie, a few people use the majority of such contacts... the question these days is whether the chooser pays, or whether that cost is socialized out among all customers.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Internet vs Phone support
One can get through web menus much quicker than listening to phone menus, web pages can offer much more content and so are usually less 'deep' in structure. Even better, accents aren't a problem with typed text, web FAQ's and knowledge searches sometimes are helpful, many common needs can be automated more easily than by phone call. Best of all is when support is utterly useless you have a written log of the nonsense to share with a supervisor, customer relations dept, media relations dept, or on the web or Usenet.
Nevertheless if a company only sees support as a nuisance, rather than a way to assist and foster good will and loyalty amongst their customers, they may design a mean-spirited useless web support site too. But in the long term companies are likely to understand that serving as many support needs quickly via the web as possible will save on human staffing and toll-free number costs. For example, Maxtor already provides diagnostic software for hard drives that issues a special unique fault code for most bad drives. Customer runs diagnostic, which company insists be done anyway, can key in the unique number and the serial number to an RMA web page, and get a replacement drive without ever being on hold and without speaking to a clueless level 1 support drone.
So I welcome the near elimination of the need for phone support, and listening to endless bad hold music mixed with 'we care about your business' messages that keeping teasing you into thinking you might have finally gotten through.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cheaper to Give Money Away
It was actually less expensive for them to just give me the money than to pay someone to look into the issue and see if I was mistaken!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Talk to the han....er...machine?
Also, I don't put in account numbers anymore. I got tired of typing a 20 digit number only to be asked for the *very* *same* *number* by the customer support representative. If I was asked to type it in, then WHY didn't the rep. get the number when I was connected through? Yet another waste of time, imho.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
It's a funny thing. Let your customers take advantage of you willingly and you can become the LARGEST COMPANY IN THE WORLD.
Treat your customers like dirt, and all you get is write-ups in the New York Times about how sh* your customer service is.
And who cares really? That senior vice-president who just outsourced 200 tech support humans to a telephone black-hole operating out of Lower Mongolia just got a nice big fat Christmas bonus and a golden parachute clause in his exit contract for creating a way for the company to meet the profit projections his dumb CEO made to Wall Street.
Who cares if customer's bail in droves. That guy made HIS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Eventually, it kept asking me for my SSN, my account number, or my internet logon (for my account). I didn't even have an account number yet. I was about to drop off some paperwork there to open a new account and it needed notarization. All I wanted to know is if there was a notary public at the office so I didn't have to make a separate stop first.
Speakeing "operator" or "agent" didn't help, it just kep asking for my social security or account number.
After about 10 minutes, I somehow reached a human. When I told her what I wanted to know, she called the branch and relayed the info to me...wouldn't even let me speak with someone directly.
At the branch, I was told that they don't have a local number.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Let the fuckers pay for the call.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
The most infuriating thing is, I call, get the "first level" tech, give him all my personal information, a detailed explanation of my problem, get transferred to a higher level tech... at which point I have to go through all of that *AGAIN*, including repeating my phone number and address and all that BS! And the detailed explanation of the problem again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]