No Warrant Needed To Search Work PC

from the makes-sense dept

A Washington State court has ruled that police do not need a search warrant to search an office computer, if the company that owns those computers agrees. The case concerned an employee of an organization who was arrested for accessing child porn via his work computers. Apparently, the police approached the company and asked for access to the employees computers, which was granted, despite them not having a search warrant. This seems perfectly reasonable, and the court agreed. The company owned the computers, so it seems perfectly sensible that they should be allowed to let the police access them, should they choose to do so. Of course, some employees may not be thrilled to find out their employers are willing to roll over even when not presented with official documents, but that's a different discussion.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Steve Mueller, 5 Jan 2005 @ 7:17pm

    Seems Reasonable

    The ruling seems so obvious as to be ridiculous. Only a moron would store child porn on a computer at work (both because of what happened and because of sexual harassment laws).

    I can only imagine this was the perp's attempt at a Hail Mary to get key evidence thrown out. And, like most Hail Marys, it failed.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    thecaptain, 6 Jan 2005 @ 5:15am

    Re: Seems Reasonable

    Seems there's a lot of morons out there.

    Our networking dept does yearly audits of our NETWORK PUBLIC drives to free up space and almost every year, around 20% of it is PORN...and these aren't personal machines...these are user directories that are shared and accessible by anyone.

    We seem to have, as a society, developped extremely POOR impulse control...I mean, porn at work...porn in CARS...porn on the cellphone..WTF? What kind of losers are these people?

    There's nothing wrong with porn..but there's a time and a place you know?

    SIGH. Thank god there has been no word of CHILD porn found at least...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 6 Jan 2005 @ 9:09am

    Re: Seems Reasonable

    Thecaptain,

    WELL SAID !

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Nipsey, 6 Jan 2005 @ 10:26am

    Re: Seems Reasonable

    20% of your network public drives?!?!
    or like 20% of jpegs or something?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    thecaptain, 6 Jan 2005 @ 11:36am

    Re: Seems Reasonable

    no..20% of the SPACE...avis, mpegs, you name it.
    and we're talking gigs here.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.