The Computer That Identifies The Hits

from the it's-all-in-the-math? dept

A bit over a year ago, we had the story of a company that was trying to break down music into 700 specific components to identify "that thang" that made it a hit. As I explained then, they were only the latest in a long line of companies trying to do so (one of which was eventually bought by Microsoft). However, while most of those companies focused on building a consumer service ("if you liked that song, our algorithms say you'll like this song..."), another company working on similar technology has apparently found a more lucrative business model: selling it as a service to musicians and record labels so they can feel more confident about how well certain songs will catch on. Unlike the company that was going to break songs down into 700 variables, this one only breaks it down into 20 components -- but apparently that's plenty. Record labels and many artists apparently swear by it. Even unsigned musicians are sending in their songs and using high scores from the company to help them get a record deal. While the obvious reaction is that this is just going to make new pop music sound even more alike, the company claims that's not true (though, as you might notice, they'd be a bit biased). They say that the mathematical signatures of songs that are similar may sound completely different. So, a hard rocking band may actually fit into the same classification as a cool jazz singer. While the article discusses the software's successes, it never mentions any failures. It's hard to believe that it's perfectly accurate, so you have to wonder if people are selectively remembering when it was right and downplaying the times it was wrong.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    jeremiah, 18 Jan 2005 @ 11:18am

    sacred ratios

    They may not be that far off, y'know. It's been shown (recently) that many of the worlds greatest works of art (DaVinci comes to mind) carefully incorporate "sacred geometry" in their design. There's also been research into aurally-incited behavior that suggests humans are prone to respond to particular frequencies.

    While I agree that total reliance on an artificial system like this could rob us of some variations in art, I don't see how it could do any MORE damage than say, B Spears and her ilk.

    Of course, one way to prove it would be to have the company publicly release the score of any Creed song. Anything above a zero and we know the software lies.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.