Landlines? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Landlines!
from the there-they-go... dept
The landline telephone is dying. While it's still a small percentage of the overall, there's been quite a bit of growth in the number of homes with no landline in the US. It seems that people are realizing they can get their internet access via broadband and their phone service via broadband or cellular. Of course, how do you count those of us who technically have a landline thanks to SBC's refusal to offer naked DSL, but don't know the phone number and most certainly don't have an actual telephone hooked up to that landline? Yes, it's a total waste, but it's still cheaper and more reliable than cable. Meanwhile, things are even more dramatic in places like India, where 90% of new telephone signups are for mobile phones rather than land lines.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
More reliable than cable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What if
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dsl more reliable than cable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: dsl more reliable than cable?
The fact that it was down for most of October contributed to that.
Every day at 9am the service would go down, and a phone call would tell me about "scheduled maintenance" and that I would be down for the day, but they couldn't tell me if it would happen again the next day. A month of that is just too much... especially when they refuse to refund money for a month of downtime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
no more landlines
Speaking of.. my wife just won 4 Motorola v300 phones and $2000 in t-mobile minutes...dumping the landline tomorrow ;P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DSL vs Cable?
I moved to a location with cable internet, serviced by Wide Open West. I've had a connection for 3 years now, pay less than DSL cost, and my total down time is under six hours, and almost all between midnight and 6am in their maintenance window.
Comcast in this area (north of Detroit) seems to have a pretty good record. My friends who use it are all happy with the speed and rarely have outages.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Therefore, if I'm the first to bring this concept up, I get a cut from whomever comes up with the technology to alleviate this situation!!
Enjoy,
-maestro7
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A few issues with getting rid of the landline
Also, there are some local utilities (here in No. VA), the require a landline phone number in order to get service.
Finally, we use a few cell phones for our business lines (and a toll-free for the customer interface) and it is a pain in the neck to get things like an SSL certificate because they use the phone book to verify that you are a "real company". In lieu of that, I have to get documents notarized. Since when did the phone company want proof that I am a "real business"?
Landlines will be around for a while.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Landline phone for diretv?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]