The Company That Spyware Built
from the try,-try-again dept
Claria is still trying to refine its image and its business model. A year and a half ago they started threatening anyone who called their software spyware and then changed their name to Claria to avoid the negative stigma associated with the Gator name. While they tried and failed to go public last year, they're still trying to clean up their image. This would be a good thing, as their image needs cleaning up... except it still seems somewhat sketchy. They're outlining a detailed plan to basically do targeted advertising arbitrage. Here's how the plan works: they buy super super cheap run of site leftover ad inventory from large publishers for next to nothing. Then, they turn around and resell that ad space as much more costly, highly targeted ad space, and clean up on the difference. How can they do this? Well, thanks to the fact that their application is already installed on so many computers, they have all this data about how and where people surf. This is the part that the article sort of glosses over. Because they've been able to get this... hmm... let's call it "monitorware" on so many computers (often without the owners of said computers knowing about it), they're in a position to do this. So, this isn't so much "cleaning up their act," as leveraging their past misdeeds (installing an app that records what you do and sends it back to their servers without adequately revealing to the end user what was happening) to make themselves look like a more legitimate business. That, in some ways, seems much, much worse. In the past, attempts at similar offerings have met with outrage from users who don't feel comfortable being targeted in this manner. It's not clear why Claria thinks it'll be fine this time.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Cleaning Up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cleaning Up?
Its a thinly designed marketing campaign to get sites like Techdirt to feed us their swill.
Death to Claria !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cleaning Up?
Its a thinly designed marketing campaign to get sites like Techdirt to feed us their swill.
What was news was CNET claiming this was them cleaning up their act, which the post here was trying to show was not the case at all. I find it hard to believe that Claria thinks the post written here is good for "marketing" since it basically picks apart why what they're doing is bad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cleaning Up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cleaning Up?
and once again you've given CLARIA a whole story... again. ( sigh )
As once said: " Even bad publicity is publicity "
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cleaning Up?
Hint: They had too much publicity.
I'm all for calling attention to every corrupt action they take.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Claria
[ link to this | view in chronology ]