Sued For Leaving Your Computer Open To Hackers?
from the blame-the-victim dept
This idea seems to come up whenever a bunch of computer security professionals get together: should victims of hack attacks take the blame? There are compelling arguments on both sides, but inevitably it leads back to the discussion of whether or not users should be required to have a certain proficiency before being allowed online (the so-called "internet driver's license" concept). In this case, however, the argument is whether or not victims of hacking attacks can get sued, and whether or not that might lead to a form of insurance, which, in turn would encourage users to be better about security to keep their "premiums" down. The idea isn't completely ridiculous. Last year, we mentioned that the FTC was fining companies that didn't properly secure their own records. However, it seems that there needs to be a second layer of review, here. First, in cases where companies are handling the sensitive data of others, then there's an expectation that they need to protect that data. However, when it's just your own systems, it does seem like "blaming the victim" to threaten lawsuits against people who haven't properly secured their computers. The real focus should go back to those who created the systems with holes in it.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Who is going to blow the whistle on this one?
“Whoops - I just got a virus… I better go tell someone so I can pay my fine.”
Not likely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
The funny thing is, viruses, trojans, exploits, hacks etc. are (for the most part) created just "because it's there". There isn't even a monetary motive for the majority of viruses.
This whole situation is really beginning to suck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Responsibility
Now, if my friend rips my seatbelt off of me when I'm driving a car and I get in a wreck, do I sue my friend? That's probably a personal decision.
What about if my friend leaves my house, leaves my front door open on his way out, and a burglar steals my furniture. Who do I sue?
It looks like the issue is sensitive to what the crime is, and who was responsible for the action. As far as computer security goes, it seems to be the undefined line.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]