Did Ma Bell Breed Execs To Fail?
from the not-such-a-good-training-ground dept
GE and IBM are often named as companies that turn out strong management execs who later go on to run other companies. Both companies have strong management training programs that are designed to create the types of leaders the company needs. It doesn't always work out that way, but in general, the reputation may be well earned. On the other side of the coin, however, some are noticing that executives who grew up at AT&T seem to leave a trail of failure in their wake at nearly every company they go to. Once again, it's not universally true, but there certainly are a large number of recognizable AT&T alumni failures at other companies. In fact, one person in the article suggests that those who succeed after coming out of AT&T do so because they learned what not to do, rather than how to manage properly. The easiest explanation for this, of course, is that AT&T was a government regulated monopoly, and the culture there was built on that understanding, rather than a real understanding of how to compete in the market. Of course, thanks to SBC, it looks like Ma Bell won't be throwing off too many more executive alumni (well, other than the current batch, of course).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re: breeding grounds
AT&T had been a guaranteed-rate-of-return company in the past, but that was no longer true in 1985. It was clear at that time however that the same high-level managers were still in control and had not changed their point of view. I wonder how many years it took for most of these powerful guys to retire...
It is said that AT&T lost $1B in its nascent computer business in 1985, a lot of money at that time. Exxon was said to have needed the whole previous ten years to lose an equal amount trying to enter the computer business.
- The Precision Blogger
http://precision-blogging.blogspot.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]