Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

1. 

   Pete Austin, 28 Feb 2005 @ 3:40am

   
   

   This is the same as mail-merge

   Mail-merge into URLs is an obvious technique used in bulk emailing. For example an image tag like the following would display the logo of your favorite sports team:
   (href="http://domain/teams/{field teamname}.gif" alt="{field teamname}")
   Microsoft's patent seems to be copying this.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

2. 

   Loraan, 28 Feb 2005 @ 5:00am

   
   

   No Subject Given

   Would UNIX's tilde (home directory) count as prior art? What about environment variables in a pathname?

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

3. 

   Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2005 @ 10:26am

   
   

   Re: No Subject Given

   Yes - countless thousands of unix shell scripts use this technique. This is nothing new.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

4. 

   Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2005 @ 10:49am

   
   

   GFS

   I don't know if this predates MSFT's claim, but RedHat's GFS supports variables as filenames -- see http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/csgfs/admin-guide/s1-manage-pathnames.html for a description of this.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

5. 

   Mark Rasmussen, 28 Feb 2005 @ 2:50pm

   
   

   Automounter

   We do this all the time w/ the automounter on unix (am-utils)... users, netgroups, all kinds of stuff.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

6. 

   Ed, 1 Mar 2005 @ 12:19am

   
   

   ClearCase

   Adding to the prior art parade...
   
   In ClearCase, one can append '@@' followed by all manner of arcane data to the end of a filename to select a specific version of the file's contents, and this has worked for at least a decade.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

7. 

   Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2005 @ 12:39am

   
   

   Prior art?

   OK, maybe I'm missing something here, but isn't this something we've done for decades? Microsoft says:
   

   "One problem with existing systems is that pathnames are essentially static. There is currently no mechanism for pathname components that are customizable or evaluated in the context of a user of the path. Once a pathname has been created, that same pathname will resolve to the same data regardless of which user is logged on, which machine the pathname resolution occurs on, or the like."

   
   Isn't this accomplished with users have different /home directories in Unix? Or "chroot"?

   Or how about the "user home directory" in Windows networking? Or using the environment variable %USERNAME% in the pathname? (After all, the Windows registry has many references to pathnames containing %SYSTEMROOT%, so it would work with %USERNAME% too.)

   Again, maybe I'm missing something, but this hardly sounds like something that "until now, eluded those skilled in the art."

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

8. 

   iksobert, 6 Mar 2005 @ 9:15am

   
   

   What are they doing?

   It sounds like M$ is trying to pull the wool over the USPTO's eyes. We all know how little time they have to investigate each claim. So there's M$..."if we make it sound really hard and really neat, they will let us dominate."

   [ link to this | view in thread ]