DOS Creator Sues Over Book Chapter

from the oh-please dept

In a recent book, writer Harold Evans described the creation of QDOS as a "rip off" of Gary Kildall's CP/M. Depending on who you talk to, many people would probably agree. However, Tim Paterson, the creator of QDOS is apparently so upset over this slight in describing something that happened 25 years ago that he's suing Harold Evans and the book's publisher. While it does suck to have your work pooh-poohed as being a mere copy, isn't it about time to look at this in perspective. Paterson won. Whether or not QDOS was a ripoff of CP/M or some wholly wonderful and new creation, QDOS went to Microsoft and Microsoft won the battle for operating systems. Who really cares what some book says? Why does everyone immediately reach for their lawyers when someone says something they disagree with?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    nonuser, 2 Mar 2005 @ 4:41pm

    brings back hazy memories

    of program segment prefixes and file control blocks (which seemed rather pointless in DOS), part of the legacy of CP/M to QDOS and thence to MS-DOS and Win 3.x.

    The baby faced kid fleeced Paterson, then turned around and fleeced the suits at Entry Systems Division. Maybe this is Paterson's outlet for delayed outrage. Where's his pot of gold?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Brian Weaver, 2 Mar 2005 @ 5:07pm

    DOS Creator Sues Over Book Chapter

    I doubt that if someone said something that was a known falsehood that could be established by a little research about you--such as your propensity to eat small kittens and puppies,raw, treated it as the gospel truth and broadcast it via various media you would be so laid back about it all. Especially if you were a passionate cat and dog owner, and ran a business catering to such owners. But since this is about someone else's life it's not ok to sue?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 2 Mar 2005 @ 5:16pm

      Re: DOS Creator Sues Over Book Chapter

      Um. First off, that's a dreadful analogy. No one said Paterson was eating small kittens and puppies. Just that he was building off of CP/M's ideas -- which isn't anything horrible. And it happened 25 years ago.

      If someone said something false about what I did 25 years ago that was stupid, but which was mostly meaningless and certainly wouldn't impact anything else I did, why would I sue? In fact, by suing, I'd only be bringing much more attention to the issue.

      Do you really think that this book would stop Patterson from getting work or anything like that if he wanted to? I highly doubt it. This isn't a character assassination. This is just someone's opinion that QDOS basically took the ideas of CP/M -- something that many people think is pretty true.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Tim, 2 Mar 2005 @ 10:06pm

        Re: DOS Creator Sues Over Book Chapter

        Remember, 25 years ago Mike was barely out of diapers :-).

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    DV Henkel-Wallace, 2 Mar 2005 @ 8:25pm

    of course CP/M

    Of course CP/M was quite familiar to me (and many other people) when first used it inherited / was inspired by various features of DEC's minicomputer and microcomputer operating systems like RSTS, RSX-11 and the like. E.g. PIP.

    Sounds like Evans' characterisation of DOS is largely correct ("shoddy rip-off" is probably too far) but the included (from the article) quote about Kildall having "invented the key language" or words to that effect seems way over the top too.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Nigel Pond, 3 Mar 2005 @ 8:42am

    No Subject Given

    Why sue? It's called defamation.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.