Microsoft Abandoning Passwords For A Different Obsolete Security Mechanism?

from the unintended-consequences... dept

Just a day after Microsoft admitted they're going to ditch passwords alone for two-factor authentication in the upcoming Longhorn operating system, Bruce Schneier is explaining why two-factor authentication is no longer secure. He's speaking specifically about banks using two-factor authentication (generally your username/password plus a token that is generating a new random number every minute), but it certainly applies to the Microsoft announcement as well. Basically, the argument is that two-factor authentication doesn't protect against active attacks, like man-in-the-middle or trojans -- both of which piggyback on the user successfully logging in with the two factor authentication. While it does prevent some of the more basic fraud, the prediction is just that scammers will move up the scale, and start focusing more on these kinds of active attacks. Of course, it does still prevent scammers from logging in on their own. They can only piggyback off an existing connection. However, it is a good reminder that scammers are always going to figure out some way around whatever technology becomes common for security.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    blapato, 15 Mar 2005 @ 1:38pm

    PKI and 2 factor authentication

    The article seems to mention only one method of using hardware tokens for two factor authentication. If used with a public key infrastructure (PKI) with a certification authority (CA), 2 factor authentication is very secure. This is because all data is sent with public/private key encryption and private key data signing, which prevents man in the middle attacks and trojan attacks. These attacks are prevented because the encryption ensures data cannot be intercepted and interpretted, and the signing enures who sent the data and that the data has not been changed. The private key for the user is stored on the hardware token, ensuring the security of the key. Longhorn (as well as the 2 factor authentication already available on windows networks) will use PKI for logging in, as do most SSL servers.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    nonuser, 15 Mar 2005 @ 2:07pm

    no (practical) safeguard will prevent every attack

    That's Schneier's message and it's well taken. But that doesn't mean universal adoption of two-factor authentication isn't a good idea. Hardware has advanced to the point where eight-byte passwords are practically useless.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.