On The Legality Of Tracking BitTorrent Files
from the search-engine-or-criminal-mastermind? dept
A few months back, when the MPAA started going after BitTorrent trackers, some people wondered if those trackers were really doing anything illegal. After all, they weren't hosting any of the unauthorized content. If anything, they were more similar to a specialized search engine, that only found torrent files -- not all of which had to be unauthorized. It appears that the guy who hosted one torrent tracking site is now hoping to use this defense against Hollywood, after receiving a lawsuit from the MPAA (in the UK, despite the charges being in the US). It's a tricky question. Realistically, there are similarities with search engines -- but that hasn't stopped the entertainment industry in the past, and it certainly didn't help the original Napster, who basically made the same argument. While the guy in this article claims he should have the same protections as Grokster, he's missing the one important fact. Grokster got away (so far...) because it didn't have a centralized directory of files that it controlled. That's the only thing many of these torrent tracker sites have. Still, it's only a matter of time until someone writes an interface for Google to just search out torrent files. Then, Google basically becomes a torrent tracking site as well. Will the entertainment industry go after Google too?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
http://www.lifehacker.com/software/search-engines/search-google-by-file-extension-031675.ph p
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yep
filetype:torrent britney
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
No they will go after the tracker sites that google finds in the search. In fact the entertainment industry will probably USE google to find the sites that they want to sue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trackers vs. Tracker-Sites
There are several layers of indirection - when does it get illegal? Oviously a nebulous hint that certain content is available at an unnamed popular Torrent-Network is not yet illegal (I assume - or is it?) - so how specific can you get?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Bram Cohen is working on torrent search too: http://redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=11346&hed=Harnessing+BitTorrent%e2%80%99s+Storm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
torrent tracking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]