Handset Makers Back To Court Over Radiation Levels
from the sue-away dept
Debates over whether or not mobile phone radiation is harmful never seem to get very far. Every other week or so, a new study comes out claiming proof one way or the other. At best, you can say the proof supporting the concept of dangerous radiation from mobile phones is "inconclusive." However, that's never going to stop lawyers. A bunch of lawsuits have been filed against handset makers for exposing people to radiation that might or might not be there. Those lawsuits were tossed out by a court saying that federal law prohibited them. However, an Appeals Court has reversed the decision, and the various lawsuits will procede. This doesn't mean that those filing the class action suits will win, but it does at least open up that possibility.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The Power of Placebo
This sounds like a classical problem for Poisson regression. What would be the autocorrelative structure, though? How would you explain log-odds ratios, logistic functions, or Pareto distributions to lawyers? If we pick different brands of cell phones as covariates, would we use the Akaike Information Criterion to compare models, or the Bayesian criterion?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Power of Placebo
Its basic physics that when energy is sent through the air, in this case microwaves, they emit radiation. If you probe the industry they can't disgree on this one. The industry also agrees that most of the radiation is absorbed into the head when a person puts their phone to their ear, again common sense.
The games played by the industry are based on questioning whether the radiation has any harmful effect on people. There have been huge numbers of studies done on this subject and its only a matter of time before the dam will burst. Scientists not paid by phone companies say it does have harmful effects and straight after studies are released the phone companies refute them.
It will be very interesting to see what happens with this large class action law suit in the US from people who have brain cancer and claim its from using their mobile phones. This is not a spivvy action brought up by lawyers. Its a landmark case that could change the whole environment for recognition of the risk of using mobile phones.
I talk with people each day who get health effects from using mobile phones, and I have a very high sensitivity to the radiation myself, so I know it real
regards
[ link to this | view in chronology ]