If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Phoenix City Council Says PD Can Have Surveillance Drones Without Any Policy In Place Because Some Officers Recently Got Shot
- New Right To Repair Bill Targets Obnoxious Auto Industry Behavior
- Former Employees Say Mossad Members Dropped By NSO Officers To Run Off-The-Books Phone Hacks
- San Francisco Cops Are Running Rape Victims' DNA Through Criminal Databases Because What Even The Fuck
- Clearview Pitch Deck Says It's Aiming For A 100 Billion Image Database, Restarting Sales To The Private Sector
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Re: Hunting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only in America
Internet hunting might actually be better because you have to wait for the animal to come into view rather than actively chasing it; if they charged by the minute or hour, it could be very profitable.
One way they could regulate it is to only allow one bullet per person and giving you a cheap scope. They could regulate it so much that it would be very difficult to actually kill an animal remotely.
The argument about "homeland security" is just plain crap. I hate how everything nowadays always comes back to terrorism. The US needs to get over itself and realize that, if American policy didn't "require" us to be the world's police and get involved in other countries issues, maybe we wouldn't be the "Great Satan". I honestly don't believe terrorists care about remote hunting; they've got bombs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Internet Hunting
Leave Congress out of this and we will depopulate the hallowed halls in quick-time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]