Customer Support Emails Way Too Easy To Ignore
from the we're-supposed-to-respond? dept
It appears that very little is changing in the world of online customer support. Over the past year study after study has shown that companies are incredibly bad at replying to customer support emails -- even when they're super fast at replying to sales inquiries. The reasoning behind this is ridiculous, of course. Customers are already paying you money, and therefore probably should be treated even better, so that you don't lose them. In fact, the latest study along these lines has found that, with especially desirable demographics, if you don't respond quickly they'll move on to your competitors -- even completely ignoring email responses that come in late. The company who did this study points out that the excuse companies use is bogus: "we get too many emails." They ask if that same company would tell people who walk in the door or who call that they'll get back to them in three or four days (though, there have been cases where I've called customer support and been told that the queue is too long, and am given no option to hold or leave a message, but just to call back later). Either way, it appears that part of this is due to the focus on "growth." That emphasizes the role of sales, compared to the role of customer support. Losing an existing customer who has been paying you money because you spent more resources trying to find new people to give you money sounds like a bad way to build a business. Customer acquisition is difficult. Keeping existing customers happy shouldn't be.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Counter-examples
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
tell them you are interested in upgrading to the latest, greatest application or hardware,
but that whether you stick with them or migrate to a competitor will be influenced by
how well they handle your problem with the current version, bought from them.
The idiots might then make the connection; not that they would actually DO anything about it.
Too many sales 'professionals' consider themselves much smarter than us clueless users.
Their worldview is cynical, to say the least.
'Sales' is viewed as THE revenue source, while support is viewed as an expense center.
In their view prospective 'new' money is worth more than proven 'old' money.
They much prefer the bird in the bush over the two in the hand.
Not having a lot of IT problems (LINUX) I see it most with magazine subscription renewals.
I have lost count of the times I have dropped and resubscribed
to get the 'new' bargain instead of the 'old' full-bore price.
Perhaps the publishers and other marketing centric businesses prefer it that way;
all those 'new' accounts give the illusion of 'growth' and help boost the stock price.
I agree that their practices are irritating enough to drive good customers away,
but I have little hope for them to remedy the sad situation.
As usual, Mike has found fertile ground for some rants.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can you tell my company that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]