Is Text Messaging Worse Than Marijuana For Your Brain?
from the hmm... dept
Remember that study from a few months ago saying that driving while talking on the phone made you "older" and "drunker" by giving you reaction times closer to people much older, or who were beyond the legal limit of alcohol? Well, forget the driving part altogether. A new report has come out claiming that just using mobile phones for text messaging alone will knock a good 10 points off your IQ (temporarily) which is worse than the effect of marijuana. The story (found by textually.org) certainly seems a bit odd. The details (imagine that!) aren't quite as exciting as the headline would have you believe. It appears that this is just a slight variation on psychologists who come out with an announcement about some random technology addiction because it sounds good and gets them extra attention for their business -- without ever looking into whether or not that addiction is actually dangerous or a problem in any way. Apparently playing the addiction card is a bit overused, so these psychologists went with the "makes you stupid" card -- which is a bit more unique. However, the reality is they're just discussing what appears to be a simple variation on what others have said: the constant distraction of certain technologies is, well, distracting. That can impair our ability to concentrate fully, and the net impact is similar to a reduction in IQ. So, basically, if you're so Pavlovian to respond instantly to every text message hitting your phone, it takes away some of your ability to concentrate on other stuff. Of course, that doesn't sound nearly as sexy as saying "text messaging is worse than pot for your brain" when the reality is basically "distracting technologies when overused can be... distracting."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
amazing
I'm a psychology major and yet, I completely agree. experiments should just relay facts (distractions...distract people) rather then psychoanalyzing those findings into a more profound conclusion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Danna at International Oddities
[ link to this | view in chronology ]