FCC Not Happy About TV Product Payola
from the and-so-it-goes dept
Last month the Wall Street Journal "broke" the widely known story that the various TV personalities you see on shows talking about products are often paid to do so by the companies who make those products. While it happens with all sorts of products, technology products are clearly a big part of the practice. One month later, the FCC has woken up to this story and realized that (oh, look at that) such practices probably violate "payola" laws. The networks are claiming they had no knowledge that the presenters were being paid, but apparently the FCC doesn't care -- noting that they put the people on their show, and it should have been their job to ask. Of course, it's a bit ironic that the FCC is now taking action on this type of payola, while the whole reason for the laws, music payola, seems to still be going strong.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Don't we already assume that people are being paid when they promote a product. Do celebs even go on talk shows if they aren't promoting something? Seems pretty rare to me. Seriously, after Diane Sawyer interviewed the pets.com sock puppet on that morning show during the 'net boom it was obvious that any mention of companies and products in the broadcast medium should be viewed as a likely paid shill. Unless it is truly presented as news, so what? The original radio payola problem seems more like something worth addressing, while radio still exists in its current form.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]