Firefighters Don't Want To Put Out Old Ideas
from the more-you-know dept
While there have been recent advances in firefighting technology, they have focused on either using existing methods more effectively (like "magic carpets" and suction cups) or improving rescue methods (like flying platforms and special parachutes). As for actually putting out the fires, it seems not much has changed. A fire chief in a small Oregon town is taking on the macho traditions of his profession with more nuanced firefighting techniques that rely on thermal-imaging and small bursts of mist. This new "3-D" approach is aimed at first controlling the gases that can lead to extreme conditions like backdrafts and explosions before dousing the fire with strong streams of water. 3-D firefighting was developed in Sweden and is being used there and the U.K. with apparent success at reducing firefighter deaths. In the U.S., though, this flies in the face of all the imagery associated with firefighting -- brute strength, massive amounts of water, big heavy equipment. Just a handful of small departments are taking the new technology seriously, while some of the larger ones (like San Francisco) are actually moving further away from it with older-style hoses. Skeptics (who seem to make up most of the profession) tried to replicate the technique and concluded that it was ineffective and potentially dangerous. Proponents say the experiment was performed incorrectly, and merely served to confirm the doubts of hidebound traditionalists. That's too bad. What harm could it do to put 3-D techniques through more fair and rigorous testing and give them a chance to prove their worth? It could actually save lives. Apparently it already has in Europe.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Blame it on Hollywood (again)!
Also, the SFFD doesn't want to try a "fog" based technique? That's too funny.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]