Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  Nathan, 7 Jun 2005 @ 11:58am

  
  

  One Great Example

  You'd think a company like Sony would sit back and look at some other examples of how letting the user community run with your offerings is a great way to make money and extend the shelf life of the product FAR beyond what anyone imagined.
  
  A perfect real-world example of this would be Valve's behavior with respect to Half Life. They released SDKs and fostered a sense of community which kept the original Half Life selling like crazy, far beyond what the market would normally bear...

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2005 @ 1:09pm

    
    

    Re: One Great Example

    
    HMMM ...
    
    Guess I made a good decision not to buy a PSP this weekend @ Circuit City.
    
    

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Cshark, 7 Jun 2005 @ 3:04pm

  
  

  No Subject Given

  The flip side to that is that Sony does sometimes encourage enthusiasts to hack and modify their product. A good example was the Linux Playstation project which yeilded and entirely new way to work with and utilize playstation hardware.
  
  The weird thing about Sony though is their inconsistant approach to this sort of thing. Maybe it all depends on who's in charge of what when.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Tim, 7 Jun 2005 @ 4:17pm

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    Sounds like it depends whether they think they stand to gain more, to me :/

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  TJ, 7 Jun 2005 @ 5:57pm

  
  

  A pattern

  Sony has a history of stupid business decisions. Clinging for dear life to BetaMax, one unsuccessful proprietary music format after another, pushed Minidisc so hard and ignored the MP3 player until the iPod became the new Walkman. Lots of smart engineers at Sony, but particularly bullheaded decision-makers.
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  David Trammell, 7 Jun 2005 @ 6:55pm

  
  

  No Subject Given

  But why wouldn't Sony want to lock out hardware hackers? Over the course of its lifetime, a purchased PSP will provide much more profit to Sony in the form of game and movie royalties, than from the initial sale of the unit. That's all these game systems are - new platforms on which to play purchased content. If the hardware hackers co-opt the device, then at best Sony sells extra PSPs to a bunch of folks who then never purchase extra games/movies (because they bought it as a cheap, portable way to play their own full-length movie rips and surf the net wirelessly), and at worst, once the DRM protecting their games is defeated, they "lose sales" to free-trading pirates.
  Please don't think I'm apologizing for them - I just think its important to understand their motivations, instead of simply saying "Sony is stupid!"

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Permanent4, 8 Jun 2005 @ 9:12am

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    Excellent analysis, David. That's the thing that keeps getting forgotten here -- game sales mean far more profit in the long run than console sales. Sony doesn't want the PSP co-opted by hackers and homebrew designers, because that may mean fewer games and movies sold, and thus, fewer royalties. They don't want people to plug the PSP into a TV, because that means sacrificing potential PS2 and DVD player sales. They don't want people to use SD cards in the PSP, because they want to sell Memory Sticks that make money for Sony.
    
    Does that make it right? Doesn't matter. It's just how the business works. This is a specific device for a specific set of tasks, and those tasks need to maximize profit for Sony. Otherwise, they would charge as much for the PSP as Archos does for the PMA430, which is quite hackable and quite expensive.
    

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Mike (profile), 8 Jun 2005 @ 9:31am

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    You assume, falsely, that a hacked PSP will never sell games. That's not necessarily true at all. People like the PSP for everything it can do, including playing games... you'll notice from the article what upsets so many of these people with the hacked PSPs is they CAN'T load the new, legally purchased, games, because it forces them to upgrade the firmware.
    
    So, the basis of your explanation doesn't hold... Making the device more valuable should help them sell more, no matter what people are using it for, and that's an opportunity.
    
    I agree that you're probably right in what Sony's thinking -- but it's likely to do more damage to them.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      David Trammell, 9 Jun 2005 @ 12:33pm

      
      

      Re: Can't play new games

      I didn't say hacked PSP = no game sales. I said hacked PSP = less game/movie/whatever sales due to "other" uses, and (eventually? certainly potentially) piracy.
      
      And I'd like to remind you that anyone with a hacked PSP can load the new games, as long as they're willing to give up their backdoor. Obviously this is going to upset folks that have already started discovering new uses for their PSPs, but we all know Sony cares less about that then it does about reaffirming that they won't sell games to an unprotected device. This should surprise nobody, given Sony's history with proprietary technology. I would fully expect them to fight this tooth and nail.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Paul Kalupnieks, 8 Jun 2005 @ 9:00am

  
  

  Locking out pirates

  It seems to me that Sony is throwing out a small # of indie developers while trying to eliminate the possibility of executing pirated games.
  
  If you allow arbitrary code to run, you allow the potential to run 'crack' software to allow games that were pirated to run.
  
  The relative # of people that will buy the PSP to develop for it is small compared to the potential people that will buy it because they can pirate games.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Mike, 3 Nov 2005 @ 3:59pm

  
  

  Dude...

  Dude, they aren't trying to stop hackers from making the PSP do more than they intended, they are trying to stop hackers from makignt he PSP run a UMD emulator which would turn the PSP into another XBox or PS2 where the iso's can be found on the net and run freely. Not that I support Sony, but what they are doing is saving themselves.
  
  -Mike

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  s.l, 18 Jul 2009 @ 7:35am

  
  

  psp hack

  ive read everything u guys have said, and in a way your all right... i myself am a big fan of hacking psp's and i can do things that only a laptop can do, such as hacking passwords and hacking into camras (NOT THAT I DO IT) but what im trying to say is that sony knows all these things, if sony is doing a few things here and there to stop this thats just a way of making us believe something thats really not. if they wanna put an end to this hacking i know they would have already.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]