Library Touts Convenience Of Digital Downloads, Then Makes Them Less Convenient
from the better-than-nothing dept
After a library on Long Island started loaning out audio books on iPod Shuffles a couple months ago, you would have expected some library to take the next step and offer just the digital files. Now the New York Public Library system is doing just that, letting members download audio books and listen to them on PCs, burn CDs, or transfer them to portable players. This is a great idea in accommodating the listening preferences of library patrons. Of course, any digital content story is not complete without looming copyright issues. Buried at the end of the story is this line: "Users can borrow up to 10 digital books at a time, and after 21 days the materials will be automatically checked in and made available to others." We're assuming this means the library is letting only a certain number of people (one, two, ten?) "check out" a digital book at any given time and giving others access when it's "checked in" (whatever that means). This makes no sense from the perspective of the library or its members because it hobbles half the advantage of digital downloads: No single person's use of the book affects anyone else's, so hundreds of members (or more) can "check it out" and enjoy it at the same time. Perhaps the library is imposing artificial limits on digital copies to appease publishers, but even in that context it makes little sense. While this may address the publishers' inevitable "fair use" complaints, they still won't be happy about the ability to make additional copies of their audio books from the loaners. It seems the library is potentially irking both sides as much as catering to them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
the utility of libraries
The better question is why do we need libraries to do this. If you have an iPod shuffle, you have an ISP. If the library can give out digital copies of this, then why not just put it on the publishers website to download?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the utility of libraries
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The problem here
What's happening is that publishers are putting tremendous pressure on ebook providers to come up with a business model that is exactly the same as the print book model - i.e., one book for one user at a time. Thus, if you want 10 people to be able to "check out" an ebook, you are forced to purchase 10 copies of that ebook.
Add to this a general paranoia (on the part of the publishers) that "ebook sales are going to canibalize our print sales!", and what you end up with is publishers that are holding their content hostage, refusing to allow it to be sold to ebook providers (or refusing to digitize it at all!)
Perhaps the biggest problem in this case is that the correct people aren't being blamed (at least not by this post). I'm not certain whence NYPL gets their ebooks, but I'd be willing to bet that they purchase them from an ebook provider who, in turn, purchases them from the various publishers who are the root of the problem. NYPL is just trying to provide a valuable service to their patrons in the best way that they know how; unfortunately, publishers are making it very difficult for them to do that in the way in which it should be done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
digital library loans
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Libraries in the digital age
Traditionally, libraries used the doctrine of first sale to retain the freedom to amass large collections of published works and then loan them out to people. The doctrine basically gives you redistribution/sale rights to any physical copy that you've legally acquired. Its the same doctrine that provides the legal basis for used book shops or video rental stores.
Unfortunately it doesn't provide any rights to generate additional copies, so libraries are struggling to find ways to simulate a "no copying" system without violating copyright law. Photocopying books at the library was also an exception (still regulated by the federal government), but it was based entirely on the individual's responsible assertion of fair use rights.
Anyways, its a big cultural problem because most of us think - hey, internet + libraries = kickass potential, but in fact adding the internet into the equation tends to put a major legal barrier between people and information.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]