E-Voting Recommendations Problematic

from the is-it-that-hard? dept

It certainly took them long enough. Given that electronic voting machines were all the rage in the last election -- despite plenty of serious questions about their reliability and accuracy, you'd think that maybe the government would have come out with more detailed guidelines before the election, rather than after. Anyway, they finally did come out with their guidelines and they don't seem to be all that useful. Most importantly, they're just guidelines. No one actually has to follow them. Second, it doesn't say that voting machines should have a paper audit trail -- which still seems like a pretty important component, especially considering stories about how some voting machines' electronic audit didn't actually match up with the votes (isn't that what an audit is supposed to do in the first place?). Of course, one interesting thing to note is that, based on these guidelines, it appears the popular Diebold machines that so many election officials didn't want to give up, wouldn't actually meet these (somewhat weak) standards.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    flipside, 7 Jul 2005 @ 10:59pm

    No Subject Given

    just an added note, i agree 100% with the problems and quirks associated with them, my question is, how hard is it really to make a machine that counts!!atomic clocks,men on the moon, machines on mars,particle accelerators,shit even a toaster is more complex a device than a damn voting machine!.ok.im done.thanks for humoring me.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    eskayp, 9 Jul 2005 @ 6:18pm

    Re: flipside

    Thanks for humoring the rest of us.
    No doubt: the technology exists.
    The 'flipside' is that the integrity of the design
    and of those who desire to implement it
    is seriously lacking.
    Has anyone started a pool on how the NEXT
    election will be stolen?

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.