Canada's National Gallery Confused About The Public Domain

from the a-lesson-in-copyrights? dept

With content in the public domain often shrinking or looked at with suspicion by content providers and the politicians they fund, it's unfortunate, but not that surprising, that folks at Canada's National Gallery don't seem to understand what the public domain means. The article first focuses on the ridiculous court order forcing people who bought the latest Harry Potter book early to return the book, along with any notes about the book -- and promise not to discuss it. However, it then follows it up with the story of a Canadian school who requested a copy of an old photograph from the National Gallery. The Gallery not only wanted to charge them a rather high fee for making the copy and sending it to them, but also demanded to see and approve how the photo would be used. Since this is a public domain photo, it's hard to see how they have the right to make that claim. The school in question then appealed to Liza Frulla, the Minister of Canadian Heritage (quite a title) who was recently quoted as saying that she "does not need advice on protecting Canadian culture" since "it is the story of her life." Frulla didn't feel the matter merited any attention and let the Gallery "protect" the public domain as it saw fit.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Ivan Sick, 19 Jul 2005 @ 6:50am

    No Subject Given

    apparently, "protecting Canadian culture" means keeping it under lock and key.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Joe Canadian, 19 Jul 2005 @ 7:05am

    No Subject Given

    All Canadians KNOW that Liza Frulla is a moron. This proves it once again.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dan Neuman, 19 Jul 2005 @ 12:23pm

    Copyright

    The National Gallery of Canada has a cool service where you can rent a very high-quality negative of any of the public-domain paintings in the gallery (about $45, I've heard, assuming they've made a negative of it). You can then scan the negative and make a print of it for your own personal use. But you cannot sell or give away the scan, because the negative itself is copyrighted by the gallery. I think this is reasonable. If you took a photo of a public domain image on display (assuming they let you), you could do what you wanted with it. But the derivative work of the gallery (the negative) is still theirs. I suspect that the copy of the photo in the article has similar restrictions.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.