Is A Denial Of Service Attack Ethical Because The Company That Does Them Says So
from the seems-a-bit-questionable dept
We saw all the stories yesterday about the "new" anti-spam system that would launch a denial of service attack on spammers and figured it wasn't really worth mentioning, because we'd already covered this topic back when much more recognizable companies Lycos and IBM experimented with similar offerings. So, while it was amusing to see trade publications call this late-to-the-game effort "dumb as a bag of hammers," it didn't seem all that interesting. This morning, however, it was amusing to see someone named Rob submit a link to an article that seems to have believed every marketing statement coming out of the company, and crowned it as "a do-not-spam registry that might work." However, the part that caught my attention was the claim in the article that, despite the concerns of just about everyone else who commented on this plan, the system of vigilante attacks on spammers was "ethical." Why? Because the company's CEO told them so. The problem, of course, with any of these systems is that there is no recourse for a site that gets knocked out by this system. So, any smart spammer will simply start spamvertising sites of people he doesn't like -- leading them all to get a denial of service attack from this so-called "ethical" system. The CEO says that won't happen because his company's staff monitors what sites are being hit -- but that just makes them the private, unaccountable judge, jury and executioner of sites they don't like.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Spam
For the last week I've been subject to a Joe Job assault from Michael Lindsay/imedia, one of the nation's top spammers.
He has been using my e-mail address and the IP address of my Web site in his spam e-mails, selling Cialis and other "male enhancement" prescription drugs illegally, without a prescription.
All the e-mails go to the same site, whose URL changes daily.
These guys are hiding in plain site. Aggressive law enforcement would put them behind bars. Yet nothing happens, and stupid vigilantism is actually seen as reasonable.
No, the solution is a real anti-spam law, and real enforcement by the federal government. If that takes a new Congress and a new President, so be it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Spam
1) You're probably already using SPF, but if not see SPF Overview.
2) If you're a big emailer, contact AOL, Hotmail and other big ISPs, with details of your mail-server. Ask them block fake emails from other IPs. AOL Whitelisting
3) If you've time to waste, keep records of the attack and report this to the police. If more people complain, maybe they will act.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
The difference between a reporter and a blogger is that reporters report stuff whether they happen to agree with it or not.
I addressed ethics directly in two sentences: "Blue chief executive Eran Reshef told ComputerWire that the system is ethical" and "Reshef said he believes the system to be ethical."
I didn't report "The system is ethical" or "The system is unethical". I'll leave that kind of opinion stuff to bloggers like yourself, Mike.
As for the headline "A do-not-spam registry that might work", I stand by it. Previous ideas, such as the ones investigated by the FTC, would not work.
This one *might*. As opposed to *will*, which seems to be your reading of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Denial of SA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]