Perfecting Spam Filtering Using Game Theory

from the costs-and-benefits dept

The trick with spam filters is always how fine do you tune them against Type I and Type II errors? Would people prefer that the spam filter be more aggressive and block the occasional legit email in favor of keeping more spam out of your inbox, or do they want to make sure that the legit emails all get through, even if it means a few extra spam messages get through as well? Apparently, some researchers are now trying to model that question using game theory -- putting a price on each of the different kind of errors. However, they also are modeling in the cost and benefit to the spammer. So spam that gets through your filter is a cost to the user, but a benefit to the spammer. They're hoping that this model will help ISPs and anti-spam operations better tune their filters to provide greater benefit to end users and higher costs for spammers. It's a good idea -- but the problem is that it's not clear that the costs and benefits are the same across different users (or emails!). Certain legitimate emails aren't a huge deal if they're caught by a spam filter, but others can be quite a nuisance.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Tim, 26 Jul 2005 @ 3:48am

    No Subject Given

    I hope the paper itself is a bunch more useful than those summaries of it. I'm well aware of the game I play with choosing to report various mails to spamassassin or not, to the point I'd say that it looks like typical New Scientist gloss, until I see the predictions from a useful theory.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.