Web Porn Tax Declared Unconstitutional On Arrival

from the as-expected... dept

As was widely expected a bunch of Senators have released a bill that tries to set up a 25% tax on online porn. Of course, by telling us all the details over the past few weeks, they've made it easy to point out immediately that the bill is almost certainly unconstitutional. Still, that assumes it gets anywhere, which it might not. Either way, though, it seems like a waste of time disguised as a grandstanding effort to appear more moral in a world where politicians seem to be trying to shove each other aside to prove who's more moral.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    nonuser, 1 Aug 2005 @ 7:01pm

    If you vote against this bill...

    then you ain't running for President.

    This is another one like the flag-burning amendment. Everyone's for it and thankfully, it somehow never makes it out of committee.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    jdw242, 2 Aug 2005 @ 9:03am

    committees...

    committees are the problem.
    these days it seems that no politician can put aside their own interests to uphold the interests of those that elected them.

    If they are doing so please let me know because it doesn't look that way.

    Kentucky's hiring practices are a very good example of personal interest at work...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mark Erickson, 2 Aug 2005 @ 12:48pm

    Porn Tax

    The attempt to tax porn is not an issue of morality as Mike implies. It's an issue of protection of our children from sexual predators and trying to put an end to something to spawns child pornagrphers and sexual deviants. The proliferation of registered sex offenders is a good indicator of something gone wrong in our society. Almost all sex offenders point to the availability of porn as their main enabler. Mike is right when he says it is a thinly disguised attempt. But it's not an attempt to impose morality, it's an attempte to protect our children. Hopefully they will find a way to make viewing porn so financially or socially painful that it will cause people to turn away from it. Unfortunately I don't know if there's anything that can done to effectively combat porn. We do indeed live in a society that has some very sick elements.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      pixelpusher220, 2 Aug 2005 @ 1:25pm

      Re: Porn Tax

      Mark Erickson's post should be titled "Thinly veiled defense of thinly veiled morality push"
      Sheesh, 'Hopefully they will find a way to make viewing porn so financialy painful that people will turn away', how is that *not* legislating morality?
      "It's about protecting our children", um how about the absent parents actually get involved in their kids lives
      Assuming they have HBO or Adult channels, do they let kids watch whatever channel they want? I doubt it...web surfing should be no different.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      cyke, 2 Aug 2005 @ 2:47pm

      Re: Porn Tax

      "...protection of our children from sexual predators"
      How can removing porn possibly do this?
      Unless: "Almost all sex offenders point to the availability of porn as their main enabler."
      Can you show me where you got this interesting bit of data? I question the validity of that statement. As far as the issue of morality goes, I am in the boat that the parents are responsible for that.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Yeah, Right, 2 Aug 2005 @ 5:55pm

      Re: Porn Tax

      What a load of bull.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.