Blame Marketing For Website Crashes
from the heard-this-before? dept
I'm pretty sure that similar studies have been done in the past, but every time another well hyped website launches and immediately crashes people wonder what the people who run the site were thinking. They knew they would get lots of traffic and seem unprepared for it. This doesn't apply to sites that are suddenly thrust into traffic, but any of these hyped up projects that gets launched only to find the website can't handle the traffic. The latest study basically says that the blame isn't on the technical staff, but on the marketing folks who never bothered to tell the IT staff what to expect. Still, it would seem like for most of those sites, it would make sense to put in place plans to handle large bursts of traffic no matter what the marketing department said (or didn't say).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Fault: IT
In the real world, it's the IT department's job to set up the technical end to support the expected traffic AND to speak with "management" to come up with a reasonable expectation (management will mediate cost versus the wildly unbelieveable claims marketing tends to make)...simply throwing tens of thousands of dollars away in technical infrastructure because marketing says something big is gonna happen is not exactly atypical of a startup either. A traffic crushed website means neither of these things happened because they are horribly understaffed or underfunded. At least they have popularity.
It amazes me how UTTERLY HORRIBLE it was to have your website down in 1999 while nowadays it's almost expected of a popular site from time to time. Culture wars.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fault: IT
The Marketing/Finance droids see that as just another expense and very often do NOT realize how important it is.
the fact that often marketing types fail to communicate with the IT department in the first place explains the capacity failure. The article clearly noted that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fault: IT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
amen
...and I am surprized that the dorpus user isn't on this one spouting some slashdot verbiage that is so far off base no one pays attention to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not easy
Slashdotting, Denial of Service and Scaling.
If your system gets overloaded, it can be very difficult to even logon to your servers, let alone fix the bottleneck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not easy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]