Porn Publisher Mistakenly Goes After Google Again

from the wrong-target... dept

A publisher of adult magazines is making some news today for asking the court to bar Google from displaying certain images they own the copyright to. This is a followup to the case they filed last year and a similar case they've filed against Amazon. However, it's the wrong target. They're going after Google (and Amazon) because they have money -- but they're not the ones infringing on the publisher's copyright. The lawsuit is because some other porn websites have copied photos that are owned by this publisher and posted them to the web for free. Google and Amazon's A9 (and just about any other image search engine) are indexing these sites and so the images show up on certain searches. The people who are infringing are the sites who have posted the photos -- but they don't have money, so the publisher is just suing Google and Amazon and demanding they not show these photos at all. That's pretty difficult as it's not like someone at these companies reviews all the photos their crawler finds before they show up in the index. Besides, if the publisher wins this case, it immediately opens up a new business model for sneaky publishers: (1) just get others to copy your content (2) sue Google/Amazon/Yahoo/Microsoft (3) profit!
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Bob3000, 25 Aug 2005 @ 11:10am

    No Subject Given

    Frist!!!!1!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    chronicon, 25 Aug 2005 @ 11:32am

    Everything on Google Infringes

    Ha! This is such a joke since everything Google or any other search engine indexes is copyrighted (unless it's public domain). If Google were to protest this by going black for a day the screams would be deafening!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ivan Sick, 25 Aug 2005 @ 8:07pm

    No Subject Given

    Why don't these idiot porn sites just watermark their images, as so many other sites do? If those ebaums idiots can do it surely they can too. "Oh no! We don't want free advertising!!"

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2005 @ 12:53pm

    No Subject Given

    Anyone got pics? Plz post!!!!1111one!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Gabbi, 3 Apr 2006 @ 3:59pm

    thank you

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.