The Web Is For Quickies And Paper Is For Long Term Commitment?
from the maybe,-maybe-not... dept
Jeremy Wagstaff has weighed in on the ongoing debate about what newspapers should do to survive in an online world, and has decided that newspapers need to treat the online world and the paper world differently. His suggestion is to create shorter content for online versions, while making the paper-based stories, longer and more in-depth. You can see where he's coming from. Online reading is definitely conducive to short, quick pieces, and longer online pieces can often become difficult or annoying to read. However, it's not clear if that's always the case. There definitely would be value in having shorter pieces online, but if the article seems really interesting, it's likely that plenty of people would want to read the whole thing -- even if it is online. In fact, that might describe the perfect way for some news sites to use blogs. Have a blog giving a quick description of the sites' own longer pieces in order to entice more people to read through the full piece. Right now, most people choose to read an article based on a headline, and maybe a quick blurb or intro text. A blog that entices readers to read the whole article or that gives some more information could be very useful. The San Jose Mercury News' Silicon Beat already does this on some stories, but it doesn't seem that common elsewhere.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
disks are cheaper than massive amounts of paper
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: disks are cheaper than massive amounts of pape
Old habits will be hard to break. I'm only 37, but still enjoy reading my Sunday newspaper more so than the online version. It's just not the same.
Granted though, we don't subscribe to the daily, just the Sunday edition. No time to read it daily, and can get my info online.
If the paper is recycled (and more communities are offering that), then the environmental concerns are diminished.
Generally speaking, people will only do something environmentally-good if there are other benefits (cost, convenience, etc.).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]