Lego Lawyers Say No One Else Can Be Named Lego
from the really-need-to-calm-those-folks-down dept
Remember last week when the Lego lawyers would scold you for going to legos.com instead of lego.com? That should have made it clear that the lawyers there take these issues quite serious. So, perhaps it isn't a surprise to find out this bit of news: Cofie writes "A dispute between a painter and a toy-maker was reported in 'The Copenhagen Post' this week. Apparently the toy producer Lego, a Danish company and maker of the toy building blocks known around the world, is suing a Danish artist because she uses her middle name, Lego, as her signature on artworks. So, the toy company is basically saying that Louise Lego Andersen's art work could be mixed up with their toy company. According to the story the name Lego goes back to before the company began. It is a perfectly legal middle name. This is yet another example of the misuse of the law with regard to brand names. It's meant for preventing ambiguity, but when cases like this appear, who's fooling who?"
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Am I wrong?
Perhaps they are starting lawsuits they know they can't win so that when a legitimate trademark issue arises noone can claim they haven't been diligent?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lego responds to my email
Thank you for your email from 09/09/05 regarding our web site.
We appreciate your comments about the trademark and/or copyright information pop-up you received while searching for us on the internet. As you might imagine, in our ongoing effort to protect our valued trademarks, we must make every effort to ensure that the LEGO brand name and associated images are reserved for the exclusive use of our Company and the products manufactured by us. For additional information on the use of our trademarks and copyrighted material, please refer to the guidelines provided in the Fair Play section on our web site at www.LEGO.com.
The information about the correct usage of our trademark was not meant to offend anyone just to protect our most valued asset. However, your comments have been forwarded to the appropriate Manager for review.
Please do not hesitate to contact us again if we can be of further assistance. We wish you many more happy hours of creative building with LEGO brand toys in the years to come.
Sonia
LEGO Direct Consumer Services
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
interestingly enough
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Innovation versus Litigation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Innovation versus Litigation
I say this as someone who owns more than 400 lbs. of bricks, so I do know what I'm talking about. This is my opinion, you have the right to disagree.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]