Fuel Cell Hype Is Back
from the this-again? dept
For years, we've been hearing all about how wonderful fuel cells were going to be and how they would replace rechargeable batteries in things like mobile phones and laptops. This still doesn't make total sense. The benefit of fuel cells is that they'll last much longer than traditional rechargeable batteries. That's a good thing. However, the replaceable nature of fuel cells is a real downside. As we've pointed out before, the reason so many devices have moved to rechargeable batteries is because people don't like the idea of having to buy and tote around replacements for their devices. Being able to recharge is much more efficient. When it comes to fuel cells, though, the most likely situation will be that you'll have to buy replaceable fuel cell "cartridges" which most people will probably refer to as batteries -- since they'll basically look and act like batteries. Some companies have realized this and backed off the fuel cell bandwagon, but it looks like the hype is back again with Toshiba talking up a fuel cell-powered MP3 player and a research firm claiming the fuel cell market is about to take off. Yes, there's a place for fuel cells, but just because they last longer, it's not clear that everyone will rush out and buy them. Having rechargeables is just much easier to deal with than always having to make sure you have a fresh pack of newThank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Throw-away fuel cells is just a capitalist load of crap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
2) AC wont split molecules.
3) See #1, topping it off with water is redundant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
To make water conductive, get it out of your faucet, its conductive, trust me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Maybe you haven't heard of a transformer/rectifier.. AKA a power adapter. They are those niftly little devices (the thing you always lose in the bottom of your box of wires and cables) that pretty much every peice of electronics uses to convert AC into DC.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just looking at the pic :rolleyes:
The only downfall to this is it's explosive... but so are lithium batteries.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just looking at the pic :rolleyes:
That's unlikely to be the way the final product is "refueled" as the article suggests. It's a bit too dangerous for the average user.
At the same time, that could be even worse, because you'd always have to carry around bottles of methanol...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For once I disagree with TechDirt's excellent arti
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Airports
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Airports
Airplanes don't allow pocket cigarette lighters, so it's unlikely that they'll allow methanol refills. 3.5mL of methanol might not sound like much, but that small amount could be used to catch other materials on fire more easily -- which isn't good on aircraft.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Airports
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fuel cells? I'm still waiting for
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
eng lish
[ link to this | view in chronology ]