Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  Stafis, 23 Sep 2005 @ 4:17am

  
  

  tech not the winner!

  Compare this to the time spent on trying to decipher the Economics and/or lawyer-jargon...
  Somehow I think we have a new winner for timewasting... ;-)
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Jason Mac, 23 Sep 2005 @ 5:19am

  
  

  Only an hour?

  I spend significantly MORE than an hour a week explaining tech jargon.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    pingywon, 23 Sep 2005 @ 5:31am

    
    

    Re: Only an hour?

    I spend AT LEAST 1 hour a day EXPLAINING tech jargon ..heh

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Joey, 23 Sep 2005 @ 5:25am

  
  

  Tech Jargon???

  I'm in accord on that one... The people asked must be pretty dumb and completely out of date on mainstream technology. As soon as something new is introduced, it gets, nearly immediately, scaled down and thrown into the consumer market. They must have asked my grandparents...

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous of Course, 23 Sep 2005 @ 6:55am

    
    

    Re: Tech Jargon???

    I agree, jargon evolves within an industry to save time. It's only an encumbrance to the neophyte or the outsider. After more than a DECade at one employer, I was still amazed by conversations that consisted of little more than acronyms and abbreviations. Jargon exists because it saves time for the people that develop it and use it consistently.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  David, 23 Sep 2005 @ 6:01am

  
  

  Speaking of that...

  tech jargon is minor. I work for a fortune 50 company and we have a web site with 1000+ pages explaining to employees what the internal jargon is and how to explain it to customers. We have a team of 5 employees that answer phone questions about internal jargon. One hour seems quite low.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Boo, 23 Sep 2005 @ 6:34am

  
  

  where's the problem?

  
  Considering the vast range of functions performed by technology in business there is surprisingly little jargon. I'll see your IBM server handbook and raise you a company tax return.
  
  He, he! I ask the finance department dumb questions about interest rates and they ask me dumb questions about how to disable macros!

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Jeff Tupholme, 23 Sep 2005 @ 7:41am

  
  

  More needed

  Seems to me that the survey respondents have rather a loose definition of 'jargon'; I think they're counting all the time they spend trying to understand menu items, dialog boxes, and help pages. What we need is new terminology to replace 'jargon' with something less ambiguous.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Cash Keith, 23 Sep 2005 @ 7:57am

  
  

  tech jargon

  I am a network administrator and it always amazes me on how some of the 'techie terms' are really English words. I get frustrated when I am told that I am speaking greek using terms like cache or queue. Look it up in Websters!

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  James Moffitt, 23 Sep 2005 @ 7:59am

  
  

  Tech jargon

  I too find it extremely hard to believe that anyone would spend an hour per week trying to decipher tech jargon. I have been doing tech support now for 16+ years and most folks ask me "what do you mean" when I use an acronym that they are not familiar with. They dont have to do any research, I do it for them on the spot. Every industry has its own unique language and set of terminology. I guess that since everyone has jumped on the technology bandwagon for the sake of faster world class customer support to their customers (we hope) that our industry trancends all across the board with regards to this perceived problem.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Kevin Trumbull, 23 Sep 2005 @ 8:20am

  
  

  Jargon? Try learning the NAMES for things....

  It's fairly universally understood that referring to all cars as Fords, or when asked which vehicle you drive saying Chevy is stupid.
  Why not so with computers? Where I work, the employees call LCD projectors "Proximas" (a company that makes Projectors), and almost any part of Office "Microsoft". I never know whether they mean "Word", "Excel", or something else. For some reason they actually call Powerpoint by it's name.
  Knowing the name for a program is not Jargon. Referring to "Easy Grade Pro" (a grade book app) as "IG Pro" (a competing gradebook app) is just dumb. Referring to "Word" as "Microsoft" is also stupid.
  Once people stop using pet names, and completely incorrect names for things, then they have earned the right to complain.
  As a tech I've done my part. I don't call memory RAM. I don't refer to clock speed, I simply say "Faster" or "Slower". I make sure to specify storage for hard drives, and explain if neccesary. I use small words when possible. My point is that as techs many of us work with degreed individuals who refuse to learn the barest essentials of the equipment that it's their job to use. RTFM, I say.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Boo, 23 Sep 2005 @ 8:35am

    
    

    Re: Jargon? Try learning the NAMES for things....

    You are onto something by saying faster/slower instead of referring to clock speeds. I think that given that we are IT professionals it does fall on our shoulders to insulate users from having to learn too much about what goes on under the hood.
    I think users are on a learning curve. Just like motorists know what an exhaust pipe is, bit by bit people are going to come to terms with the concepts of a drivers and dlls - even if they dont ever learn how they work. They will get there - eventually

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Kevin Trumbull, 23 Sep 2005 @ 9:07am

      
      

      Re: Jargon? Try learning the NAMES for things....

      I think users are on a learning curve. Just like motorists know what an exhaust pipe is, bit by bit people are going to come to terms with the concepts of a drivers and dlls - even if they dont ever learn how they work. They will get there - eventually
      

      
      I'm not sure that it won't be willful ignorance that prevails. It's amazing how many people don't even attempt to learn something, instead calling a tech and waiting an hour for it to be done for them. This includes things as simple as setting up an Outlook profile (which involves remembering "Exchange server" and "companymail1" or "companymail2"). I refuse to play this game, always making them sit and enter the information themselves. I work in the educational sector now, which is even worse than corporate america in this regard.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Anonymous Coward, 26 Sep 2005 @ 7:32am

      
      

      Re: Jargon? Try learning the NAMES for things....

      This is the *wrong* approach. Yes, you make it easier on the user by using simple terms, but the trade-off is that you perpetuate their lack of understanding until the next time they ask the exact same question. Yes, you may have to explain it more than once, but eventually they'll get it. Education is both the problem and the answer in this situation.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2005 @ 8:32am

  
  

  No Subject Given

  We had two lawyers come down to give us our annual corporate ethics briefing last year. Whenever someone asked a question that could be answered with a simple "yes" or "no" they couched the answer in so much legalese gobbledygook that nobody knew what the hell the answer meant. The only answer they gave that anybody understood was "I'll have to get back to you on that."

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Al Michael, 23 Sep 2005 @ 8:49am

  
  

  Tech jargon

  September 23, 2005
  Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
  
  It has been my experience that once I have setteled on a useful and contextual description of most tech jagon I find I can understand and use it fully. As the author of this comment correctly implies, it seems likely that a person who needs an hour per week to assimilate this information is simply looking for an excuse to explain their wasted time.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    allan michael, 23 Sep 2005 @ 8:53am

    
    

    Re: Tech jargon

    What an insightful and intelligent comment. You are truly a man of above average intelligence.
    

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Ben Mc, 23 Sep 2005 @ 9:59am

  
  

  Over and over again

  I've explained the same jargon to people over and over and over again. Sometimes its the same people calling, asking how to access their webmail every week. People write important things down on sticky notes and think that's going to make their life easier.
  It wastes 2 hours of my week because people can't remember tech jargon.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Precision Blogger, 23 Sep 2005 @ 10:26am

  
  

  `It's easy to spend an hour a week deciphering jar

  I doubt most people have jobs subject to this problem, but when you do, you spend more than 1hr/wk. Consider what happens when you have to read a 200 page document that refers to 150 unfamiliar acronyms! You have to keep referring to what they mean, and the definitions do not sink in quickly.
  
  There are lots of such documents in the tech industries. If you are writing new kinds of software or bidding on projects, or reviewing regulations affecting your work, or writing specifications, you run into these docs all the time.
  - Precision Blogger

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  VonSkippy, 23 Sep 2005 @ 12:42pm

  
  

  How much time?

  Takes me mere seconds to call people morons or dumbasses.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  DigitalBomb, 23 Sep 2005 @ 3:43pm

  
  

  ...

  I do not see a difference between tech "jargon" like RAM or OS and Internet Lingo like "LOL" or "WTF?". Except perhaps, that internet lingo actually angers me with its blatent promotion of communication laziness. Tech "jargon" is used to save time on the job. But what if I am installing switches and hubs for a school's library and someone tells a joke and I yell "ROFL!"? Does not exactly make me sound intelligent to yell "ROFL".

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2005 @ 4:19pm

    
    

    Re: ...

    Odd you should mention that, I just yelled ROFL to a joke yestday!

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]