Corporate VCs Who Buy High And Sell Low
from the understanding-the-reasoning dept
For years, we've been following the ups and downs of the corporate VC market. In many ways, it followed the regular VC market. Corporate VC offerings were incredibly popular during the boom years when it seemed like the stock market was taking dot coms in one end and spitting billion dollar bills at the other. However, as the original dot com bubble burst, many companies had a tougher time justifying their VC arms, and shut them down. In many ways, that's the exact wrong time to do so. It only makes sense if the purpose of the corporate VC program is to make money on the direct returns from the investment. Getting good returns is certainly important, but it shouldn't be the core reason for a corporate VC program. It doesn't play to what differentiates them from pure VCs. A good corporate VC offering is focused on finding investments that are complementary to their core business. So, the purpose is more about investing in companies that can help grow the overall market, rather than just for the direct returns. If that's the case, the best time to be doing corporate VC work is when all the other VCs aren't doing anything and the public markets are shy about taking startups public. That makes it easier to find good companies and to invest in them and help them actually grow. That seems to be exactly what some new research is showing. The real benefit of corporate VC work isn't directly in the returns from those investments, but when those investments help grow the overall market demand by being complementary. Of course, now that it looks like a new bubble is expanding, expect to see many more corporate VCs jump back in, just as the price of investing starts to skyrocket.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Maybe it's me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]