Imagine... An Internet With Potholes That Never Get Fixed
from the who-edits-the-editor dept
Just as Mike predicted, the fallout from the Level 3-Cogent peering fight has lead to calls for more government regulation of the Internet. Now, the executive editor of News.com has written a rather unconvincing treatise on why the US government should own the Internet and treat it like a utility. It's hard to know where to start taking his argument apart, but the premise that the government can do a better job of running the Internet than private companies is pretty intrinsically flawed: witness the Net's rise over the last 10 years, all on the back of private industry. The author tries to liken the Internet to the federal interstate highway system, saying that it's something that can only be run effectively by the government -- this doesn't hold at all, as there are an endless supply of examples of privately owned roads around the world that are, pretty much without exception, better maintained than the average US interstate. Also, look at a problem that plagues US highway legislation: pork. Imagine replacing pet highway projects with pet Internet projects, where you get higher speeds depending on who's Congressional district you're in. Finally, the biggest issue is that the Internet doesn't belong to the US government, regardless of what it thinks. Witness the big push from the EU and other nations to de-centralize DNS control from ICANN and the warning that the Net might splinter if they're unsuccessful. While it's possible that heavy US government control of the Internet might prevent another peering spat, it's more probable that it would cause even more problems.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
not quite...
When I get free wireless at Panera Bread, should I be worried about them imposing all sorts of restrictions on my access? I'd say I'm happy enough just enjoying the internet for free.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Read Alla Bout It
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Read Alla Bout It
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Internet was NOT "all on the back of private indus
That is just factually untrue.
The internet was financed by the US federal government from it's inception as a DARPA project to the now infamously ridiculed bill sponsored by Al Gore to subsidise the first public backbone connections.
However, since there is no limited public resource required, making it a "public utility" is just as ridiculous an argument.
OTOH regulation o interstate and international commerce is clearly withing the Federal Government's domain under our constitution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well, take a look..
Deregulation has made a few people rich and screwed the rest of us.
maybe having some of the internet as a utility would be a good thing.
Only roads I've seen with potholes are the ones here in California. Nevada has *great* roads. So does Minnesota, and North Dakota... and, oh pretty much every other state I've driven in over the past year.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
rangers rule
[ link to this | view in chronology ]