JibJab Explains That Fair Use Only Applies To Stuff They Agree With

from the selective-fair-use? dept

David Goldenberg from Gelf Magazine wrote in to tell us about a blurb they have on their site quoting Gregg Spiridellis of JibJab on why they decided to sue the maker of a parody video for using a 9 second clip from their own parody "This Land Is Your Land" for which, they, themselves were sued. The message boils down to them being upset that the video was being used in a partisan way -- but that doesn't answer the claim that it was fair use. The thing with fair use is you don't really have control over how the content is used.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2005 @ 8:15pm

    dupe...

    and to think I came here as a slashdotter...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Mike (profile), 17 Oct 2005 @ 9:11pm

    Re: dupe...

    ??? This isn't a dupe. It's a follow up to the original story (which we link to in the post...).

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2005 @ 2:38am

    Re: dupe...

    Mike,

    Slashdotters are either correct and loud, or wrong and silent. He won't be back.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Luke, 18 Oct 2005 @ 6:27am

    Re: dupe...

    As a fellow slashdotter, I agree. He (obviously not a she if they read slashdot) will never be back again. BUt hey, at least we don't have dupes every day.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Brett, 18 Oct 2005 @ 9:50am

    Wrong again

    While I agree that JibJab's position has no legal basis, once again Techdirt gets the facts wrong. JibJab was not sued for the original parody (they received a C&D letter). Likewise, JibJab did not sue Black Lantern; they sent them a C&D.

    While this site is sometimes interesting, its frequent errors and knee-jerk anti-IP stance ruin any credibility it may be trying to acheive.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2005 @ 10:53am

    Re: Wrong again

    What's wrong with an anti-IP stance? The idea that immaterial things can be counted as property is holding back the development of humanity in a hundred different ways.
    And everybody makes errors sometimes. That it means so much to you says more about you being anal-retentive than it does about techdirt.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Brett, 18 Oct 2005 @ 12:23pm

    Re: Wrong again

    Very big of you to attack me personally rather than arguing the merits. Why stop at suggesting that ownership of intagible property is bad; do you advocate for no private property at all? If not, how do you make a prinicpled distinction? the protection of creative expression (copyright, in case you're unaware) encourages authors to make their work available, secure in the knowledge that someone else cannot come along and steal it for free)

    I suspect your anti-IP stance is not an informed one and you probably don't know the difference b/n patents, copyrights and trademarks. And you likely wear birkenstocks w/ socks.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2005 @ 5:23pm

    Re: Wrong again

    Haha, that's hilarious. You're so backward. You really think that money is the reason why people are creative, don't you? Man, you REALLY don't get it. And I'm not going to explain it to you.
    I won't discuss the merits of intellectual property laws with the likes of you though, as discussing alternate points of view with those who have opinions such as yours is usually as pointless as talking with a wall.
    However, I would like to know just how much of the funny statement you made above you truly believe in so if you don't mind, could I ask you a question?
    If all the money in the world vanished tomorrow, do you think that people would stop inventing, researching, programming, writing, making movies, and making music, since there wouldn't be any cash in it?
    Please say yes, I love a good laugh.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.