Sick Of The Internet Yet?
Shocker -- Mobile Data A Rip-off

Stolen Credit Card + Winning Lotto Ticket = Stupid Criminal

News You Could Do Without

from the yes-i-am-santos-l-halperin dept

Fri, Oct 28th 2005 10:07am — Carlo Longino
An Oregon woman went to the state's lottery HQ earlier this month to claim the first installment of a $1 million prize she'd won with a ticket. She took the $33,500 and ran -- the only problem being she'd bought the winning ticket with a stolen credit card. Apparently the woman used her mother-in-law's card -- her mother-in-law that died over a year ago. So a lesson for stupid criminals everywhere: stick to cash. And to whoever stole all those numbers from CardSystems: don't buy lotto tickets.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

38 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anthony, 28 Oct 2005 @ 11:21am

    Here's your sign

    who buy's a lotto ticket with a credit card anyway? they cost a dollar!!!

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Neosin, 28 Oct 2005 @ 11:27am

      Re: Here's your sign

      Stupid stupid stupid... can't believe that...

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      matthew, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:37pm

      Re: Here's your sign

      in texas you cant by anything "lotto" with credit card.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        buckie, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:39pm

        Re: Here's your sign

        from the article.

        "Detectives began tracking Goodenow on Wednesday after learning that she had used the credit card to purchase several items, including the ticket."

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    BP, 28 Oct 2005 @ 11:29am

    can't do that here

    Minnesota doesn't let you buy lottery tickets with credit card. "Yeah, I'd like 2000 powerball tickets please. Put it on my card. I'm SURE to win that way."

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    CharlieWoo, 28 Oct 2005 @ 11:31am

    No Subject Given

    So are the winnings going to goto somebody else? or does they just keep what they didn't have to give out.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2005 @ 11:54am

      Re: No Subject Given

      It probably won't work this way and I really don't care about meth-heads anyway, but I think she should have to use the money to completely clear the debt of her aunt's credit cards and herself, but she should be able keep the remainder of the money. She should also be punished for the fraud she was busted for and the meth that was found. Jail time is necessary, but she should still get the money for the lottery in my opinion.

      Luck is luck. What if i found a winning lotto ticket in the trash because the purchaser was an idiot and it ended up being purchased illegally? Do I not have the right to cash it in then? I really don't know the rules of lotto since playing at all is so foolish on a mathematical level. But I don't think how a lotto ticket is obtained should matter. And I don't think you should become inelligible just because you are a criminal or have committed a crime in the past.

      My logic is probably a little flawed, but eh, whatever...

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Bob, 28 Oct 2005 @ 12:21pm

        Re: No Subject Given

        "...but she should still get the money for the lottery in my opinion."

        What if I stole $1 from your wallet and purchased a lottery ticket. Then I got lucky and won 50 million dollars from that $1 of yours.

        By your logic, I am entitled to the winnings because it was ME who lady luck smiled upon, not you. The fact I used your dollar is irrelevant, you are entitled to nothing. By the way, once I collect my first installment of the 50 mil, remind me I owe you $1.

        On a personal note I do play the lotto, but spend the minimum amount necessary for an entry. There is no point to buying multipliers or any of that nonsense. Sure its a far fetched game, but without an entry you're 100% guaranteed to lose.

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          BK, 28 Oct 2005 @ 12:49pm

          Re: No Subject Given

          Of course! Just because the dollar was mine before you stole it doesn't mean I would have used it to play the lotto and won. You should be arrested for stealing my wallet, but still get your winnings.

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Buckie, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:03pm

            Re: No Subject Given

            Agreed. You should only be charged with the crime committed. Whatever goes on the record, punishment, and the payback of the dollar? What he did with dollar was not illegal even though ill gotten. I am sure some of the money we have now has been stolen in one form or another. And that make you responsible for having stolen money if it had never been given back to it original owner at one point. Making you just as guilty as the thief.

            Possession is 9/10ths of law and ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it.

            [ link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Kat, 28 Oct 2005 @ 6:40pm

              Re: No Subject Given

              I think there is a difference between having stolen money unknowlingly, and stealing it yourself. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there, who do have money that has been stolen at some point, in one form or another, but.. the difference is.. they don't know that they have the stolen money.

              [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          RBasil, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:09pm

          Re: No Subject Given

          "Sure its a far fetched game, but without an entry you're 100% guaranteed to lose."

          Bob, You have it backwards. Without an entry you are 100% guaranteed NOT to lose. In fact I would consider it winning because you didn't waste your money playing in the first place.

          You lottery players always amuse me with your excuses for blowing your money time and time again.

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Don Morse, 31 Oct 2005 @ 11:04am

          Re: No Subject Given

          let's take that logic a step further. you stole a dollar from my wallet, bought a lottery ticket and won, and I'm entitled to nothing. wrong, if you hadn't stolen the dollar, you would not have been able to purchase the ticket. It's mine.

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Kat, 28 Oct 2005 @ 1:47pm

        Re: No Subject Given

        I don't think they should get the money, if they used stolen money to purchase the ticket.. in which ever form the money comes.. be it coins, or bills.. or credit card... a crime is a crime, and that's all there is to it... that's like saying if someone robbed a diamond store of all their precious jewels, that just because the diamonds belonged to the jewelers before the criminal stole it.. doesn't mean they still belong to the jeweler after... this way of looking at it.. means they technically belong to the theif... and they should get to keep the loot, even though they obtained it illegally. ...

        No person should get to keep the loot, from something, if they gained it in an illegal manner.

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Buckie, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:12pm

          Re: No Subject Given

          "means they technically belong to the theif... and they should get to keep the loot, even though they obtained it illegally. ..."

          I agree with that. But this is a little different.

          Say the diamonds are stolen. Thief uses the diamonds to cut glass sculptures, that sale like mad, and he makes a fortune (Like playing the lotto with stolen dollar)

          Then his is found guilty of stealing the diamonds. Does that mean he has to give back money made for his work he used them for? After he does his jail time, gave back diamonds and whatever else might happen to him in the legal process?

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:14pm

          Re: No Subject Given

          How many times have you won playing the lotto buddy? And if you were to add all those dollars up, how much have you spent?

          The reason you win if you do win is luck, period.

          Since it was her relative, I don't see a problem with her keeping the money if she pays it back to the credit card company along with all the other charges on the card. What if her aunt had given her permission to use her card before she died?

          And why the hell is the credit card working when the owner of it is deceased anyway??? I mean come on, no wonder there is so much fraud. That's just ridiculous.

          Are there any laws that say it isn't OK to use someone else's credit card when you have their permission?

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 30 Oct 2005 @ 9:47am

            Re: No Subject Given

            The purchase is a fraudulent transaction, therefore null and void. The money goes back to the lottery as if the winning ticket had never been sold.

            [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        RBasil, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:13pm

        Re: No Subject Given

        Criminals should not be able to profit from their crimes. PERIOD!

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:20pm

          Re: No Subject Given

          "Criminals should not be able to profit from their crimes. PERIOD!"

          So its illegal to play the lotto?

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            CoolNerdBoy, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:34pm

            Re: No Subject Given

            I completely agree with the fact that she should be allowed to keep the money she won. Not giving her the money after her hopes are up so much is extremely cruel. She should be punished for what she did, but she shouldn't have to live regretting it for the rest of her life; the crime here is pretty benign, especially if it's a "stolen" credit card that belonged to a now deceased person.

            [ link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            RBasil, 29 Oct 2005 @ 4:52pm

            Re: No Subject Given

            "So its illegal to play the lotto?"

            With a dead womans credit card.... Yes it is.

            [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:28pm

          Re: No Subject Given

          99% of the time, yes you are right, a criminal should not be allowed to profit from a crime. But this is a strange situation. And it was only a dollar.

          The "CRIME" she committed she profited one dollar. And you are right she should not be able to keep that dollar. She should have to pay back the money used illegally and be punished for doing it (with fines or jail time if necessary). The money she made was not made because of a crime by any means. It was made because she was lucky enough to obtain that lottery ticket.

          The simple fact remains that if she had stolen a dollar bill off her dead aunt's dresser a year ago and just now used it to buy the lottery ticket, noone would have disputed a thing.

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            nostranonymous, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:32pm

            Re: No Subject Given

            She shouldn't be allowed to keep the money ONLY because she was using a credit card to purchase a $1 item.

            In fact, anyone who does that should IMMEDIATELY be thrown in front of a train.

            [ link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              buckie, 28 Oct 2005 @ 2:36pm

              Re: No Subject Given

              "She shouldn't be allowed to keep the money ONLY because she was using a credit card to purchase a $1 item."

              Where does it state that was all she bought? ;)

              [ link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              RBasil, 29 Oct 2005 @ 4:54pm

              Re: No Subject Given

              "She shouldn't be allowed to keep the money ONLY because she was using a credit card to purchase a $1 item."

              No, she shouldn't be able to keep the money because she was using a DEAD WOMAMS credit card to purchase a $1 item.

              [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        drew, 28 Oct 2005 @ 3:11pm

        Re: No Subject Given

        so if i steal a truckload of lotto tickets, and one happens to be a winner, i should get the money?

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          thatguy, 28 Oct 2005 @ 3:38pm

          Re: No Subject Given

          No because you stole the tickets. She didn't steal the ticket, she bought it with stolen money. BIG DIFFERENCE!

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            drew, 28 Oct 2005 @ 4:06pm

            Re: No Subject Given

            "No because you stole the tickets. She didn't steal the ticket, she bought it with stolen money. BIG DIFFERENCE!"
            "But I don't think how a lotto ticket is obtained should matter."

            no difference to the person i was replying to

            [ link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            RBasil, 29 Oct 2005 @ 4:55pm

            Re: No Subject Given

            "She didn't steal the ticket, she bought it with stolen money. BIG DIFFERENCE!"

            HAHAHAHAHAHA! Tell a Judge that and see how far it get's you.

            [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ironman2003, 28 Oct 2005 @ 11:49am

    Stolen Credit Card

    Funny thing is according to our local news paper where it happened, (Medford, Oregon), she signed the credit card reciept in her own name. OOPS!

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ironman2003, 28 Oct 2005 @ 11:51am

      Re: Stolen Credit Card

      Here's the link to the story by the way with her picture.

      http://www.mailtribune.com/archive/2005/1028/local/stories/03local.htm

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Oct 2005 @ 12:04pm

      Re: Stolen Credit Card

      That sucks but may help prove her "innocence" in the matter. For all we know, she borrowed the credit card with permission from her aunt before she died (yes a year earlier i know, but i've left shit i dont use in my wallet for much longer) or received it when she died and just had it on her still. Then she may have accidentally used the wrong card to purchase her items at the store.

      I mean if you were actually TRYING to use a credit card illegally, you'd probably at least sign with the name that's on the card. And you wouldn't only be buying little convenience store items. But then again, she was on meth most likely and therefore probably borderline retarded. It could go either way.

      Was there any evidence of her abusing the card at any other times since her aunt's death?

      OR... maybe she just had shitty credit and was using it and paying off the card in her aunt's name because she couldn't get her own card in her name.

      All kinds of possibilities.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Stoned4Life, 28 Oct 2005 @ 12:10pm

    Let her have it

    If she's that stupid, I think they should pity her and either keep the money she already received, or give her all of it...

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    nick, 28 Oct 2005 @ 4:29pm

    No Subject Given

    i live in oregon, i buy lottery tickets, you are required to pay cash.......!

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      ironman2003, 28 Oct 2005 @ 6:16pm

      Re: No Subject Given

      On the contrary, you can buy lottery tickets with just about anything. We had our personal checks stolen a few months ago and the iddiot took them to a supermarket and bought 40$ in tickets with a forged check. We have her on video. This is in the same city (Central Point, Oregon) where the credit card was used in this area.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    julie, 29 Oct 2005 @ 8:43pm

    lottery

    South Carolina law expressly forbids buying lottery tickets with anything but cash. This includes credit cards, debit cards, check cards, checks, and gift cards. I'm not anti-lottery but I appreciate the forethough on this law, do we need to make it easier for gambling addicts to rack up a 1000 dollar scratch ticket bill?

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Lukas B, 31 Oct 2005 @ 12:43am

    I call bullshit

    I dont think anywhere in the US you can purchase lottery tickets with a credit card. Has to be cash.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    diane, 20 Jul 2009 @ 8:27am

    credit cards

    the only methods you can generate credit cards is send your credits cards information to 111._???sooooo at least you will get back two credit information.. try it cos it works.. i did mine and i have gotten more than 200ccs now

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]


Sick Of The Internet Yet?
Shocker -- Mobile Data A Rip-off
Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

Friday

19:39 Important Announcement: Techdirt Is Migrating To A New Platform (0)
More arrow

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.