The Bigger Your Hard Drive, The Longer You Wait For Trial?
from the details-please...? dept
The Inquirer is a bit short on details on this story, so perhaps someone here can fill us in. They seem to be saying, however, that police in the UK are justifying holding suspects in computer crime cases in jail for a period of 90 days because it takes longer to go through a hard drive than a stack of papers. As the Inq notes, as hard drives get bigger, does that mean the pre-trial time in jail gets longer? Even worse, now that so much is moving to network based storage, where the whole damn internet may be your "hard drive," can they just hold you indefinitely while they read everything online?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
so...what if they just printed everything out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fools...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: fools...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Other news today
Perhaps there are too few computer-literate officers to search drives promptly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Other news today
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Background Notes
90 days detention - Google Search
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's retarded
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's retarded
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
90 days while the police search a computer?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 90 days while the police search a computer?
In case you were wondering... no, losing your key isn't a defence. Welcome to totalitarian Britain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Automated tools
You do of course realize they can see the files you have deleted or at least portions of them and even if you take a hammer to your hard drive there is a good chance they will get back a good chunk of it...
When you set up a trial and want to convict someone of a crime you don't look at thier desktop for a file that says "kiddie porn" there is a good chance the criminal has researched 6-12 ways to hide this from most people... The police need to determine what system the user used to keep the files hidden.. and then to crack it or restore the data... THEN search it.. THEN catalog it.
Sometimes it's as simple as dropping to dos in a directory where the files are all named like CK1678.jpg which is the initials of a girl or photographer and then doing ren *.jpg to *.txt suddenly it drops out from "radar" because neither the name nore the suffix is suspect... now delete all those files and hit the HD with a hammer.... that's really going to make some computer forensics guy pissed off.. he will find it... but it will take a while.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Automated tools
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Automated tools
Now do this on the above mentioned 3 terabytes of storage mentioned above, while the police are kicking your door in. It can be done, but it takes time that people generally don't have.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Automated tools (mojo's ignorant comment)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Automated tools (mojo's ignorant comment)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
search engine
I guess the key stone cops don't have google's desktop search engine. That would explain why they think it takes longer to search thru a computer drive than a large stack of paper. (wouldn't they index that stack of paper in a computer database?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]