TV Execs Giving Up On The Kids?
from the one-way-to-deal-with-things dept
We've already written about how kids are avoiding the movie theaters for a variety of reasons, including all of the other entertainment options out there that often are cheaper and don't make you feel like a criminal. It appears those same kids and young adults are also ditching television as well. Again, not a huge surprise. A year and a half ago, we wrote about how people in the "hot" demographics were watching less TV and how TV execs were mostly in denial about the whole thing. It seems that some of those execs have moved past the denial stage, and, as alex points out, are now saying that the "youth" market they used to love so much doesn't really matter so much any more. Nope, now they're focusing on a somewhat older demographic, hopefully one that includes the millions of baby boomers out there. It turns out they're the important ones to go after, and all those kids can go to hell... or play Grand Theft Auto, or whatever it is they do with their time that doesn't involve watching TV.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Of course, the future isn't their problem
Never fear though, plenty of companies are working hard to fill in the gaps. Microsoft, Apple, Google... the future media companies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No TV For Me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From the Advertising Perspective
The days of selling the sizzle are over, you've got to have real steak and a better steak than anybody else in today's market. Then you tell'em about it. Mediocrity can no longer be forced to the top by virtue of clever marketing -- hence the downturn for things like movies, music and virtually anything from Micosoft.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From the Advertising Perspective
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From the Advertising Perspective
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kids are just more
The same goes with TV. I see TV "targeted" to kids by dumbing down their content. Hell, it worked form them on Saturday morning for forty years, right? Well, no! Comedy Central gets them tuning in with Daily Show and the Colbert Report (although following that with Carolla is back to the "dumbing down" technique!).
If you are older, then ask yourself a simple question. What did you like watching when you were 18-25? I mean, what did you really like? I sure as hell wasn't watching Laverne and Shirley! Television almost lost me completely because the sitcoms back then were notoriously bad (there were some exceptions: M*A*S*H comes immediately to mind). Now, add to this the fact that kids have more options nowadays, with game consoles, iPods, the Internet, and content producers will need to come up with something worth watching.
Lorne Michaels was considered a genius when he created SNL back in 1975 which had a demographic that advertisers had only considered a wet dream before that. It wasn't anything drastically different, and he readily admits that he got the idea from watching Monty Python in Canada. It's basically the old Dean Martin style variety show with more current entertainment and a very cynical eye on current events. I admit that SNL has had its ups and downs since then, but it's still out there and people notice it... just ask Ashley Simpson! However, even that is getting a bit old and kids see it as from an older generation. Somebody needs to come up with a format that will catch the attention of the kids (even while horrifying their parents, as SNL tried to do).
Come up with better stuff than Ashton Kutcher and those horrid UPN shows. Despite what you may think, kids aren't just listening to their iPods, playing GTA, pirating songs and movies, and swooning over the latest People magazine. Give them entertainment that they want, or risk losing them forever.
Because...
Like it or not, that "no longer important" kids demographic of today is going to be the important "thirty and forty something" demographic of tomorrow, and if you piss them away now, you'll find it very hard to get them back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TV Sux
The sitcoms are mostly tired old "tried and true" formula sitcoms. The news is not even remotely interesting especially since almost every story is hyped beyond sensibility. Most of the reality shows are just terrible with their negative plots to tear people down and show them at their worst.
I would rather spend my money on a FIOS connection and time on the internet reading stories that are interesting. Researching things I've heard from everyone else to get my own well rounded opinion. Also, many of my fellow gen xers are physically active. We get out and play and socialize.
And we teach our kids to do the same. Move beyond just what we are told to watch and what we are told is news. Find things that are interesting to you and don't let tv tell you what is interesting. We are no longer at the tv's mercy for news and entertainment! Halleluiah! I LOVE THIS ERA! :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is that exclusive?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]