Why Microsoft Wanted To Buy Claria
from the it-all-becomes-as-bit-clearer dept
Remember over the summer when Microsoft "leaked" information about how they
might want to buy Claria, most well known for the adware Gator? After many people reacted negatively, Microsoft
popped that trial balloon and said they weren't going to buy the company. Well, with Microsoft's recent
"Live" announcement, where they made it clear that much of the Live offerings will be ad supported, the thinking behind the possible Claria purchase became a lot clearer. There's an article today talking about how much
Microsoft is going to be relying on their new AdCenter ad targeting platform to squeeze more money out of any advertising on the Live systems. The problem is that, right now, AdCenter only does keyword based matching, and Microsoft desperately wants behavioral matching -- which is what Claria is now offering (even though that behavioral matching is based on
surreptitiously installed software). What this means, of course, is that there's plenty more to come, and don't think for a second Microsoft won't look at other buying opportunities in the behavioral advertising space to figure out some way to make an ad-supported model actually work.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
good catch
It's also interesting how mute the Microsoft reaction has been on the Sony DRM rootkit story... they're saying they're "concerned", but so far haven't denounced it as a massive invasion of privacy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Adware / spyware in Live "applications"
Scenario: Person writes a letter to a manufacturer of some product. As they type, the ad box on the side (if we are so lucky) pops up with advertisements for a corresponding product.
Please spare me the convenience of "Live" products.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pics from Office
http://ecpm.typepad.com/clickety_clack/2005/11/why_microsoft_w.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Claria
[ link to this | view in chronology ]